ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2026
Model of naturally occurring refractive error (NORE) in mice.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Purpose: Animal models of myopia typically induce monocular refractive shifts via form deprivation (FD) or lens-induced myopia (LIM), modeling susceptibility to myopia, but with potentially limited applicability to childhood myopia. Here we describe a novel, genetically diverse mouse model of naturally occurring refractive error (NORE) with three distinct refractive phenotypes: hyperopic, myopic, and intermediate. Methods: C57BL/6J mice were mated to 129S2/SvPasCrl mice to create F1 or F2 offspring. Refractive errors in male and female F1 (N=21) and F2 (N=101) mice were assessed on postnatal days (P) 28 and 42 using photorefractometry. In a subset of mice (N=30-40), corneal radius of curvature, axial ocular dimensions, retinal and visual function were assessed. Results: F2 mice were classified as NORE with either hyperopic (RE≥0 diopters (D) at P28 and P42), myopic (RE<0D at P28 and P42) or intermediate (RE<0D at P28 and RE≥0D at P42) refractions based on individual trajectories. All ocular parameters changed with age, with significantly slower growth in axial length and vitreous chamber depth in the intermediate versus myopic mice (p<0.05). Lens thickness was smaller in the myopic group at P28. Differences in refraction were not attributed to variances in retinal function or dopamine signaling. Conclusions: NORE mice represent a novel, genetically diverse wild-type mouse model that, unlike traditional models, does not require interventions such as FD or LIM to induce myopia. NORE mice provide a valuable tool for future investigations of genetic and environmental mechanisms and targeted therapeutic strategies for refractive errors.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.