Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42465197›Full record

ArticleCureus2026

Assessing Awareness, Protective Eyewear Utilization, and Associated Factors Among Construction Workers in Nagpur, Maharashtra.

Rajesh Pattebahadur, Kanishk Singh, Sagarika Snehi, Pooja Panjwani, Vandana Iyer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Rajesh PattebahadurOphthalmology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Nagpur, IND.
Kanishk SinghOphthalmology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Nagpur, IND.
Sagarika SnehiOphthalmology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Nagpur, IND.
Pooja PanjwaniOphthalmology, Dr Agarwals Eye Hospital, Mumbai, IND.
Vandana IyerOphthalmology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Nagpur, IND.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and aim Workers on construction sites and in multiple industries experience many ocular injuries, which can affect their ability to continue working. Such injuries can be easily prevented with appropriate and effective eye protection. This study aimed to evaluate the awareness of occupational ocular injury risks and their potential implications, such as visual impairment and blindness, among construction workers (knowledge domain); assess worker attitudes regarding occupational ocular safety and the utilization of protective eyewear (attitude domain); assess the prevalence of protective eyewear usage and identify obstacles to its adoption among construction workers (practice domain); and determine the independent variables of protective eyewear utilization, including educational level, exposure to occupational hazards, length of work, and history of previous ocular injury, using multivariable logistic regression analysis. Methods A cross-sectional analytical study was conducted among 133 participants who presented to the All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), Nagpur Ophthalmology OPD, and were engaged in various work at construction sites in and around Nagpur, Maharashtra. Data were collected over a period of 12 months from January 2022 to December 2022. Participants were given an expert-reviewed, content-validated, bilingual (English and Hindi) questionnaire, and responses were recorded by the investigator on a predesigned data collection form. Literate participants independently completed the structured bilingual questionnaire, while illiterate participants had each question read aloud in Hindi by the investigator, and their responses were recorded on a predesigned proforma. All statistical tests were performed with a 95% confidence interval, and p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results A total of 133 participants were enrolled in the study. Nearly all respondents (132; 99.2%) knew that their job could cause eye injury. Upon analyzing education level, seven (15.2%) primary school-educated workers wore protection, compared with 17 (56.7%) post-high school-educated workers and three (50%) diploma holders. Educational status was significantly associated with the use of protective eye gear (p = 0.003). Educational status (adjusted odds ratios {AOR} = 2.865, 95% CI: 1.725-4.739, p < 0.001), type of work (AOR = 0.707, 95% CI: 0.549-0.911, p = 0.007; interpreted with caution given nominal scaling of work categories), and prior injury history (AOR = 3.886, 95% CI: 1.472-10.257, p = 0.006) were significant independent predictors of protective eyewear use. Duration of work was not a significant independent predictor of protective eyewear use (AOR = 0.864, 95% CI: 0.458-1.629, p = 0.650). Conclusion This study concluded that although workers' awareness of the use of protective eye gear was high, adherence and use were very low. Educational status, type of work, and prior history of ocular injury were key determinants of protective eyewear use.

Indexed as

community educationcommunity ophthalmologyconstruction industryepidemiology of ocular traumaeye injury preventionsurvey research

Identifiers

PMID42465197
PMCPMC13374535

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.