ArticleCureus2026
Audit of Cesarean Section Rates in a Tertiary Care Hospital Using the Modified Robson Classification System.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background The increasing rate of cesarean section (CS) has become a significant public health concern worldwide because of its association with increased maternal morbidity and healthcare burden. The Modified Robson Classification System is an internationally accepted tool for auditing and monitoring CS practices. Objective To evaluate CS patterns and identify the major contributors to rising CS rates in a tertiary care hospital using the Modified Robson Classification System. Methodology This retrospective audit was conducted in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology at Shifa College of Medicine from March 2023 to February 2025. A total of 493 women who underwent CS were included. Maternal demographic characteristics, obstetric history, indications for CS, and neonatal outcomes were obtained from medical records. Cases were categorized according to the Modified Robson Classification System, where Group 5C comprised women with previous cesarean scar(s) with singleton cephalic pregnancy at term, and Group 2A included nulliparous women with singleton cephalic term pregnancy undergoing induction of labor. Data were analyzed using IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 23 (Released 2016; IBM Corp., Armonk, New York, United States). Results The mean maternal age was 29.5 ± 5.9 years. Women with previous cesarean scars constituted the majority of cases, with Group 5C contributing 51.9% (256/493) of all CS, followed by Group 2A contributing 23.5% (116/493). Fetal distress was the leading indication for CS in 31.8% (157/493) of cases, followed by previous multiple cesarean scars in 28.0% (138/493) and refusal of trial of labor after cesarean in 18.5% (91/493). Among primigravida women, fetal distress accounted for 64.4% (85/132) of cesarean deliveries. Favorable neonatal outcomes were observed in most cases, with live births occurring in 97.6% (481/493) and NICU admissions in 2.2% (11/493) of neonates. Conclusion Women with previous cesarean scars and nulliparous women undergoing induction of labor were the major contributors to the overall CS rate. The Modified Robson Classification System is an effective tool for identifying high-contributing groups and guiding strategies aimed at reducing unnecessary cesarean deliveries while maintaining safe maternal and neonatal outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.