ReviewCureus2026
Switching Between Reference Adalimumab and Biosimilars in Adult Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Systematic Literature Review.
Review in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Biosimilar adalimumab agents have been introduced as cost-effective alternatives to reference adalimumab for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD); however, uncertainties remain regarding the outcomes of switching between reference and biosimilars in routine practice. Therefore, this systematic review was conducted to assess outcomes following switching between reference adalimumab and biosimilars in adult patients with IBD. A systematic search was undertaken in PubMed/MEDLINE, the Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar to identify relevant studies. Eligible studies included randomized controlled trials, cohort studies, registry-based analyses, and real-world evidence evaluating adult IBD patients (≥18 years) who switched between reference and biosimilar adalimumab. A total of seven studies comprising 5721 patients were included. Among these, three were prospective studies, three were retrospective studies, and one was a cross-sectional study. Follow-up ranged from six months to 26 months. Across studies, remission and response rates after switching were comparable to continuation on reference adalimumab, with most cohorts reporting remission in 74-90% of patients. Biomarkers generally remained stable or improved. Persistence outcomes were heterogeneous, with specialized centers reporting high multi-year persistence (>80%). Safety profiles were similar across products, with injection-site reactions being the most frequent adverse events (AEs) and a common cause of discontinuation. Serious AEs were rare. Immunogenicity data were limited but did not indicate clinically meaningful differences between reference and biosimilars.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.