ArticleThe British journal of cardiology2025
Thromboprophylaxis strategies for patients with a Fontan palliation: practice in the NHS.
Article in The British journal of cardiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Adults with Fontan palliation face variable risks of thrombosis and bleeding. The optimal thromboprophylaxis strategy remains unclear. There is a balance between the risk of thromboembolism and bleeding with thromboprophylaxis. Recent studies suggest direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) may provide effective thromboembolism prevention, but concerns regarding bleeding risk, hepatic impairment, and lack of robust data persist. This study investigates thromboprophylaxis practices among UK adult congenital heart disease (ACHD) specialists, focusing on the use of DOACs in Fontan patients. An electronic survey was distributed to UK National ACHD Consultant Group members from February to March 2023. Based on hypothetical clinical scenarios, the survey collected demographic data, familiarity with DOACs, and preferred thromboprophylaxis strategies. Responses were analysed using descriptive statistics to identify patterns in practice. There was a maximum response rate of 42%, with 32 respondents participating, primarily consultants from level 1 ACHD centres. Thromboprophylaxis strategies varied significantly: DOACs, warfarin, and aspirin were used with varying frequency, depending on clinical factors, such as arrhythmias, thrombosis history, and patient-specific challenges. While 35% of respondents were comfortable prescribing DOACs, 42% expressed reservations, citing limited evidence and concerns about risks. This study highlights wide variability in thromboprophylaxis strategies for Fontan patients in the NHS, underscoring significant gaps in evidence. Hepatic considerations, patient-specific challenges, and the lack of DOAC licensing for certain scenarios contribute to the complexity of clinical decision-making. Prospective studies are essential to guide practice, and patient involvement in shared decision-making is critical in the interim.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.