ReviewDigital health
Predictive modeling for early detection and prediction of diabetes and cardiovascular diseases using big data and machine learning.
Review in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This scoping review aimed to explore how big data and machine learning techniques are currently applied to develop predictive models for the early identification and prediction of diabetes and cardiovascular diseases, while identifying methodological strengths, implementation gaps, and ethical considerations. Methods: Following PRISMA-ScR guidelines and the Arksey and O'Malley framework, a comprehensive literature search was conducted across five major databases, covering studies published from 2013 to 2025. Studies were included if they used ML with big data sources to predict diabetes or cardiovascular diseases. Data were extracted, thematically synthesized, and quality appraised using a modified Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT). Results: Out of the screened studies, 66 studies were included in the final synthesis. Most employed supervised machine learning techniques such as decision trees and ensemble models, drawing on electronic health records, wearable sensors, and multi modal datasets. Deep learning approaches, while less common, showed promise in handling unstructured data. Key challenges included data heterogeneity, limited external validation, and underrepresentation of diverse populations. Ethical issues like algorithmic bias and lack of model interpretability were noted. Real-world implementation remained sparse, with few models integrated into clinical workflows. Conclusion: Predictive modeling using big data and ML holds significant promise for early disease detection, yet translation into practice is hindered by methodological, infrastructural, and ethical challenges. Future efforts must prioritize transparency, inclusivity, and interdisciplinary collaboration to ensure responsible deployment in real-world healthcare settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.