ArticleFrontiers in medicine2026
Development and validation of an interpretable machine learning model for predicting chronic atrophic gastritis in elderly patients.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Chronic atrophic gastritis (CAG) is a key precancerous condition, but its screening in the elderly is hindered by the invasiveness, high cost, and limited accessibility of endoscopy. This study aimed to develop and validate interpretable machine learning (ML) models for predicting CAG in elderly patients and identify key predictive factors. Methods: We adopted a retrospective cohort study design using data from the Endoscopy Department of Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital. Two independent cohorts were included: a development cohort (January 2023 to December 2024, Results: Through multi-dimensional feature selection integrating univariate/multivariate logistic regression, recursive feature elimination (RFE), Boruta algorithm, and clinical expert review, eight key variables were identified. Nine ML models were constructed and optimized, with performance evaluated using metrics including area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, and F1-score. The Multilayer Perceptron (MLP) model demonstrated optimal performance, with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.826 (95% CI: 0.788-0.864) in internal validation and 0.780 (95% CI: 0.745-0.815) in temporal validation. SHAP analysis revealed that Helicobacter pylori infection, age, smoking status, and high-salt pickled food intake were the top risk factors, while fruit and vegetable intake was a protective factor. Conclusion: This study developed and validated an interpretable ML model for predicting CAG in elderly patients. The model, incorporating eight readily available clinical variables, provides a non-invasive, accessible tool for risk stratification and may facilitate early screening and targeted intervention in primary care settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.