Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42465100›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in medicine2026

VISULYZE-assisted nomogram optimization enhances astigmatism correction accuracy in keratorefractive lenticule extraction: a stratified retrospective analysis.

Yanfen Liao, Nian Guan, Bin Zhang, Zhengwei Shen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Yanfen LiaoDepartment of Refractive Surgery, Hubei Bright Eye Hospital, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
Nian GuanDepartment of Refractive Surgery, Wuhan Bright Eye Hospital, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
Bin ZhangDepartment of Refractive Surgery, Hubei Bright Eye Hospital, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
Zhengwei ShenDepartment of Refractive Surgery, Hubei Bright Eye Hospital, Wuhan, Hubei, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Keratorefractive lenticule extraction (KLEx) commonly relies on empirical nomogram adjustments to improve refractive accuracy; however, astigmatism correction remains suboptimal. VISULYZE (Carl Zeiss Meditec AG) enables data-driven nomogram optimization, but its differential effectiveness across astigmatism severities has not been fully characterized. This study compared VISULYZE-assisted nomogram optimization with empirical nomogram adjustment for spherical and astigmatic correction, using stratified vector analysis to quantify gains in precision. Methods: This retrospective case-control study included 206 eyes that underwent KLEx between December 2023 and July 2024 and completed a minimum 3-month follow-up. Eyes were assigned to either VISULYZE-assisted nomogram optimization (VISULYZE group, Results: At 3 months, 100% of eyes in the VISULYZE group achieved a UDVA of 20/20 or better, compared with 98% of control eyes; furthermore, 87% of the VISULYZE group vs. 73% of the control group achieved 20/16 or better ( Conclusion: VISULYZE-assisted nomogram optimization improved the accuracy of both spherical and astigmatic correction in KLEx, with consistent benefits across astigmatism severities. This data-driven, iterative refinement paradigm may standardize nomogram development and may be particularly valuable for less experienced surgeons transitioning from empirical adjustment to evidence-based, dynamically optimized surgical planning.

Indexed as

astigmatism stratificationkeratorefractive lenticule extractionnomogram optimizationrefractive surgeryvector analysisVISULYZE

Identifiers

PMID42465100
PMCPMC13373657

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.