ArticleFrontiers in medicine2026
Characteristics in the uterine cavity microbiota of infertile women with hydrosalpinx or endometrial polyps revealed by shotgun metagenomics.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Infertility is a global public health issue, and a favorable endometrial environment is essential for successful assisted reproductive treatment. Endometrial polyps (EM) and hydrosalpinx (HD) are common gynecological disorders impairing the intrauterine milieu, but their impacts on uterine cavity microbiota remain unclear. This study enrolled 75 participants [32 fertile controls (C), 32 EM patients, 11 HD patients] to characterize their uterine cavity profiles using shotgun metagenomic sequencing. The C group showed significantly higher microbial alpha diversity than the two patient groups, with no significant difference between EM and HD groups. At the species level, EM group exhibited marked dysbiosis, characterized by elevated pathogenic bacteria, particularly
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.