Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42465061›Full record

ArticleISME communications2026

Porewater microbial community dynamics act as an indicator of northern peatland ecosystem change in response to climate drivers.

Madison Green, Tianze Song, Caitlin Petro, Jose L Rolando, Katherine Duchesneau, Josephine Treitz, Rachel M Wilson, Jeffrey P Chanton, Joel E Kostka

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ISME communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Madison GreenSchool of Biological Sciences and School of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, Center for Microbial Dynamics and Infection, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA 30332, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6942-837X
Tianze SongSchool of Biological Sciences and School of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, Center for Microbial Dynamics and Infection, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA 30332, United States.
Caitlin PetroSchool of Biological Sciences and School of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, Center for Microbial Dynamics and Infection, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA 30332, United States.
Jose L RolandoSchool of Biological Sciences and School of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, Center for Microbial Dynamics and Infection, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA 30332, United States.
Katherine DuchesneauSchool of Biological Sciences and School of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, Center for Microbial Dynamics and Infection, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA 30332, United States.
Josephine TreitzSchool of Biological Sciences and School of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, Center for Microbial Dynamics and Infection, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA 30332, United States.
Rachel M WilsonDepartment of Earth, Ocean, and Atmospheric Science, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL 32306, United States.
Jeffrey P ChantonDepartment of Earth, Ocean, and Atmospheric Science, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL 32306, United States.
Joel E KostkaSchool of Biological Sciences and School of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, Center for Microbial Dynamics and Infection, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA 30332, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3051-1330

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Northern peatlands store approximately one-third of all terrestrial carbon, making their belowground microbial communities key regulators of peatland carbon cycling and climate feedbacks. We examined how climate drivers alter microbial community composition across peat and porewater habitats over a 0-200 cm depth profile by leveraging the SPRUCE (Spruce and Peatland Responses Under Changing Environments) experiment. SPRUCE uses whole-ecosystem warming to simulate temperature increases from 0°C to +9°C above ambient as well as elevated carbon dioxide (CO₂) treatments. Through small subunit ribosomal ribonucleic acid amplicon sequencing, we found significant differences in taxonomic diversity, abundance, and community composition between attached (peat) and free-living (porewater) microbial assemblages. Porewater communities exhibited significantly higher microbial diversity, lower abundance, and were more responsive to ecosystem-level manipulations (warming and CO₂) than their peat counterparts. The relative abundance of putative methane-cycling microorganisms, methanogens, and methanotrophs was comparable in surface peat and porewater, but at deeper depths, methanotrophs were far more abundant in porewater. Additionally, warming more strongly stimulated putative methanotrophs than methanogens, particularly in porewater, resulting in a more abundant methanotrophic community across all depths. Our results show that peat and porewater habitats harbor distinct microbial communities that respond differently to climate change drivers. The distinct nature of porewater communities, particularly the observed dynamics of methanotrophs, underscores their role in peatland carbon cycling and highlights their potential as sensitive indicators of environmental change, with significant implications for peatland restoration and carbon management in a changing climate.

Indexed as

carbon cyclingclimate changemethanogenesismethanotrophymicrobial diversitypeatland

Identifiers

PMID42465061
PMCPMC13374860

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.