ArticleISME communications2026
Porewater microbial community dynamics act as an indicator of northern peatland ecosystem change in response to climate drivers.
Article in ISME communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Northern peatlands store approximately one-third of all terrestrial carbon, making their belowground microbial communities key regulators of peatland carbon cycling and climate feedbacks. We examined how climate drivers alter microbial community composition across peat and porewater habitats over a 0-200 cm depth profile by leveraging the SPRUCE (Spruce and Peatland Responses Under Changing Environments) experiment. SPRUCE uses whole-ecosystem warming to simulate temperature increases from 0°C to +9°C above ambient as well as elevated carbon dioxide (CO₂) treatments. Through small subunit ribosomal ribonucleic acid amplicon sequencing, we found significant differences in taxonomic diversity, abundance, and community composition between attached (peat) and free-living (porewater) microbial assemblages. Porewater communities exhibited significantly higher microbial diversity, lower abundance, and were more responsive to ecosystem-level manipulations (warming and CO₂) than their peat counterparts. The relative abundance of putative methane-cycling microorganisms, methanogens, and methanotrophs was comparable in surface peat and porewater, but at deeper depths, methanotrophs were far more abundant in porewater. Additionally, warming more strongly stimulated putative methanotrophs than methanogens, particularly in porewater, resulting in a more abundant methanotrophic community across all depths. Our results show that peat and porewater habitats harbor distinct microbial communities that respond differently to climate change drivers. The distinct nature of porewater communities, particularly the observed dynamics of methanotrophs, underscores their role in peatland carbon cycling and highlights their potential as sensitive indicators of environmental change, with significant implications for peatland restoration and carbon management in a changing climate.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.