ArticleISME communications2026
Diatoms vs dinoflagellates: a temporal network analysis of bloom impacts on phytoplankton diversity and community structure in French coastal waters.
Article in ISME communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Understanding phytoplankton community responses to bloom events is essential as these have major implications for biogeochemical cycles and marine food webs, but can also be harmful to ecosystems, the economy, and public health. Diatoms and dinoflagellates are the two most common bloom-forming classes, with distinct ecologies and bloom dynamics. Using time series from a long-term phytoplankton monitoring survey (REPHY) of French coastal waters analyzed with ecological association networks and diversity metrics, we investigated how blooms of diatoms and dinoflagellates affect diversity and community structure within phytoplankton communities. We highlight distinct responses: an increase in species richness during diatom blooms and a decrease during dinoflagellate blooms. However, both bloom types resulted in a decrease in Shannon and Pielou indices. Temporal association network modularity and association strength were also differently impacted between the two bloom types. However, high-level association types and composition in association networks remain stable, suggesting an important role of their proportions in ecosystem functioning and resilience. We propose several hypotheses for these findings based on known ecological and biological processes that remain to be tested individually in dedicated studies. Our work underlines the importance of distinguishing the different types of blooms and studying the role of interactions between phytoplankton for a better understanding of their dynamics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.