Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42465051›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical and translational science2026

Comparing the effectiveness of master's-level clinicians and peer supports for the delivery of attachment and biobehavioral catchup.

Elisabeth Conradt, Claire Dahl, Kristen Cotton, Erin Hoffman, Evette Horton, Mary Dozier, Danielle S Roubinov

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical and translational science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Elisabeth ConradtDepartment of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-0169-5658
Claire DahlUniversity of Delaware, Newark, DE, USA.
Kristen CottonUniversity of Delaware, Newark, DE, USA.
Erin HoffmanThe University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Evette HortonThe University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Mary DozierPsychological and Brain Sciences, University of Delaware, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Danielle S RoubinovDepartment of Psychiatry, University of North Carolina Chapel Hill, NC, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The goal of this study was a re-analysis of a randomized controlled trial evaluating the effectiveness of Attachment and Biobehavioral Catchup (ABC), an early childhood parenting intervention. We compared the effectiveness of ABC for enhancing parental sensitivity and child behavior among 79 dyads who received the intervention as delivered by peer support specialists (n = 49 dyads) or master's-level clinicians (n = 30 dyads). Peer support parent coaches were non-inferior at enhancing parental sensitivity and parental intrusiveness as parent coaches with a master's degree. This research has important clinical implications for increasing access to ABC for parents involved in the child welfare system.

Indexed as

Comparative effectivenessfoster careparental sensitivitypeer support

Identifiers

PMID42465051
PMCPMC13373599

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.