ArticleJournal of clinical and translational science2026
A data navigation model to improve access to research data resources in clinical and translational science.
Article in Journal of clinical and translational science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Clinical and translational investigators increasingly rely on complex institutional and national data resources, yet barriers related to data discovery, governance, and access pathways remain common. To address fragmentation in data access, we piloted a Data Navigation Program within the Clinical and Translational Science Institute (CTSI) that established a trained Data Navigator as a centralized first point of contact for investigator data inquiries who provided individualized consultations, facilitated connections to data domain experts and honest broker services, and increased awareness of institutional data assets and regulatory requirements. To better characterize investigator needs, a CTSI-wide survey assessing data sources, governance, and training priorities was conducted in collaboration with the Clinical Translational Data Science (CTDS) Workgroup. Results demonstrated strong demand for structured guidance in data discovery and governance navigation. These findings informed refinement of the program, including development of the Research Data Source Match, a self-service decision-support tool implemented in REDCap that generates customized data access roadmaps based on investigator characteristics and data needs. During the pilot year, the Data Navigator conducted consultations addressing electronic health record (EHR), PCORnet resources, and government datasets. Integrating personalized navigation with scalable self-service tools may reduce barriers and support responsible data use in translational research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.