ArticleFrontiers in cell and developmental biology2026
Automated macular hole staging on optical coherence tomography using an optimized ResNet-18 framework.
Article in Frontiers in cell and developmental biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To develop and validate a deep learning model for automated macular hole (MH) staging using optical coherence tomography (OCT) images. Methods: This retrospective study included OCT-confirmed MH images collected between July 2019 and October 2024. After quality control and redundancy screening, 6,243 representative OCT images were retained. Highly similar consecutive scans were excluded through combined manual review and program-assisted similarity assessment before model development. Models were developed using standardized preprocessing and five-fold cross-validation. ResNet-based and Swin Transformer-based architectures were constructed and compared. ResNet-18 was further optimized by integrating deformable convolution (DCNv2) and efficient channel attention (ECA). Results: Swin Transformer Tiny achieved high training accuracy but showed unstable performance on the test set. In contrast, the optimized ResNet-18 demonstrated more consistent classification results across validation folds. The optimized ResNet-18 achieved accuracy, precision, recall, F1-score, specificity, and AUC values of 98.23%, 97.17%, 96.90%, 97.00%, 99.44%, and 99.76%, respectively. External validation showed consistent classification accuracy on independent data. Conclusion: The optimized ResNet-18 achieved accurate and stable MH staging using OCT images under a standardized training framework. Compared with deeper CNN and Transformer-based architectures, the proposed model demonstrated more reliable performance under limited-data conditions. These findings support the feasibility of automated MH staging using OCT images.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.