Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42464910›Full record

ReviewMolecular biology and evolution2026

What has population genomics told us about the dynamics of selection and plant adaptation?

Brandon S Gaut, Stephen I Wright, Tianpeng Wang, Peter L Morrell

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Molecular biology and evolution, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Brandon S GautDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology and Department of Systems Biology, UC Irvine, Irvine, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1334-5556
Stephen I WrightDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-9973-9697
Tianpeng WangDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology and Department of Systems Biology, UC Irvine, Irvine, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2693-8377
Peter L MorrellDepartment of Agronomy and Plant Genetics, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6282-1582

Funding

Minnesota Agricultural Experiment StationNSF DEB-2414478
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Population genomics has transformed our understanding of how natural selection shapes plant genomes. The explosion of whole-genome resequencing data has enabled estimates of nucleotide diversity across genomes, clarified how selection interacts with recombination and demography, and broadened inference beyond crops and model species to virtually any plant system. Here, we synthesize key lessons and outstanding challenges concerning the action of natural selection on plant genomes. One message is that purifying selection is a pervasive selective force acting against deleterious mutations and structural variants, but its efficacy varies predictably and is often relaxed after demographic contractions, including domestication bottlenecks, range expansions, shifts in mating systems, and polyploid formation. Adaptation also routinely shapes genetic diversity, as evidenced by the detection of selective sweeps. Swept genes have functional biases, but many outstanding questions about adaptive variation remain, including the selection coefficients of adaptive alleles, whether selection typically acts on segregating variants or de novo mutations, and how often selection is polygenic. As with polygenic selection, our knowledge about balancing selection is limited, due in part to challenges in its detection. It is known, however, to act on disease-resistance genes and genes that govern breeding systems. Finally, an emerging theme in plant population genomics is the interplay between introgression and adaptation, but it remains challenging to link introgression confidently to fitness, and further study requires an expanded, multispecies scale. This review reveals the power, and some of the limits, of population genomics to infer the dynamics of selection on plant genomes.

Indexed as

Adaptation, BiologicalGenome, PlantPlantsSelection, GeneticAdaptation, PhysiologicalEvolution, MolecularGenetics, PopulationGenetic Variationadaptive evolutionbalancing selectionintrogressionplant genome evolutionplant population genomicspurifying selection

Identifiers

PMID42464910
PMCPMC13455019

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.