ReviewMolecular biology and evolution2026
What has population genomics told us about the dynamics of selection and plant adaptation?
Review in Molecular biology and evolution, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Population genomics has transformed our understanding of how natural selection shapes plant genomes. The explosion of whole-genome resequencing data has enabled estimates of nucleotide diversity across genomes, clarified how selection interacts with recombination and demography, and broadened inference beyond crops and model species to virtually any plant system. Here, we synthesize key lessons and outstanding challenges concerning the action of natural selection on plant genomes. One message is that purifying selection is a pervasive selective force acting against deleterious mutations and structural variants, but its efficacy varies predictably and is often relaxed after demographic contractions, including domestication bottlenecks, range expansions, shifts in mating systems, and polyploid formation. Adaptation also routinely shapes genetic diversity, as evidenced by the detection of selective sweeps. Swept genes have functional biases, but many outstanding questions about adaptive variation remain, including the selection coefficients of adaptive alleles, whether selection typically acts on segregating variants or de novo mutations, and how often selection is polygenic. As with polygenic selection, our knowledge about balancing selection is limited, due in part to challenges in its detection. It is known, however, to act on disease-resistance genes and genes that govern breeding systems. Finally, an emerging theme in plant population genomics is the interplay between introgression and adaptation, but it remains challenging to link introgression confidently to fitness, and further study requires an expanded, multispecies scale. This review reveals the power, and some of the limits, of population genomics to infer the dynamics of selection on plant genomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.