ArticleThe Journal of animal ecology2026
Boldness and niche width structure spatial interactions in a natural rodent community.
Article in The Journal of animal ecology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Boldness and niche width structure spatial interactions in a natural rodent community.The Journal of animal ecology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Consistent among-individual differences in behaviour can influence how individuals distribute in and use space, and thus influence competition within and between species, with potential consequences for species coexistence. These behavioural traits help characterize ecological niches, particularly under varying intensities of interspecific competition. While previous work examined behavioural type-dependent spatial interactions between pairs of ecologically similar species, here we extend those analyses to a full multi-species community context, including newly analysed species. In a natural rodent community of four co-occurring species, we tested whether boldness predicts space use and spatial interactions within and across species of varying ecological similarity. Boldness covaried positively with core area and home range size across all species, indicating consistent behavioural type-dependent differences in space use. In contrast, microhabitat use and neighbour density showed little association with boldness. Evidence for personality-dependent spatial structuring emerged primarily in metrics capturing spatial proximity and ecologically similar encounters, suggesting that behavioural effects on interactions are context dependent, being most evident among ecologically similar competitors and in distance-based measures of spatial interactions. Overall, our results suggest that boldness is most clearly linked to how individuals use space, whereas effects on spatial encounter structure within the community are weaker and appear to differ between the relatively more generalist and more specialist species in the community with respect to habitat use and diet. These findings support the idea that behavioural type-dependent space use can contribute to individual niche differentiation and may influence how potential interactions are distributed within ecological communities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.