Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42464877›Full record

ReviewMedicinal research reviews2026

Late I

Arkapravo Chattopadhyay, Lynn C Lunsonga, Peter E Light, Khaled Barakat

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Medicinal research reviews, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Arkapravo ChattopadhyayFaculty of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8043-069X
Lynn C LunsongaFaculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Department of Pharmacology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-1496-1420
Peter E LightFaculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Department of Pharmacology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Khaled BarakatFaculty of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3567-7279

Funding

CIHR PJT-183967Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada RGPIN-2020-04437
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Nav1.5 channel, a major isoform of voltage-gated sodium ion channel, is mainly found in ventricular cardiomyocytes, playing a key role in generating essential cardiac action potentials for normal heart rhythms. Mutations in Nav1.5 have been associated with severe heart conditions such as long QT syndrome, Brugada syndrome, cardiac conduction disorders, atrial fibrillation, and dilated cardiomyopathy. Recent research has linked Nav1.5 to cardiac fibrosis and proposed its role in non-cardiac illnesses, including specific neurological disorders and cancers, subjects that will be reviewed in this paper. On the other hand, sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i), initially designed to manage diabetes by facilitating glucose excretion through urine, have demonstrated unexpected and encouraging cardioprotective benefits in clinical trials. This review compares the important SGLT2 inhibitors empagliflozin, dapagliflozin, and canagliflozin in terms of their interactions with Nav1.5 and their therapeutic effects on the heart. We also investigate new medications and compounds being developed to regulate Nav1.5 function, providing a preview of potential future treatments. Past attempts to develop late I

Indexed as

Computer SimulationDrug DevelopmentNAV1.5 Voltage-Gated Sodium ChannelTranslational Research, BiomedicalAnimalsHumansSodium-Glucose Transporter 2 InhibitorsNAV1.5 Voltage-Gated Sodium ChannelSodium-Glucose Transporter 2 Inhibitorslate INamultiscale modelingNav1.5SGLT2 inhibitorssodium channel mutations

Identifiers

PMID42464877
PMCPMC13637061

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.