ArticleNucleic acids research2026
Characterizing RNA 3D structural features from DMS reactivity.
Article in Nucleic acids research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- MERGE-RNA: a physics-based model to predict RNA secondary structure ensembles with chemical probing.Nucleic acids research · 2026Article
- Divergent RNA structures support accurate splicing of the SF3B1-sensitivebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Quantifying MgbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Ubiquitous low-energy RNA fluctuations and energetic coupling measured by chemical probing.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Designing molecular RNA switches with Restricted Boltzmann machines.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Cryo-EM study and in vivo chemical mapping of the Methanosarcina acetivorans ribosome and its dimerization via a repurposed enzyme and translation factor.The Journal of biological chemistry · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Dimethyl sulfate (DMS) chemical mapping probes RNA structure, where low reactivity is generally interpreted as Watson-Crick (WC) base pairs and high reactivity as unpaired nucleotides. Studies examining DMS reactivity of RNAs with known 3D structures have identified nucleotides that deviate from this interpretation with distinct solvent accessibility and hydrogen bonding patterns. Understanding the frequency of these outliers and their recurring 3D structural features remains incomplete. To address this, we systematically analyzed DMS reactivity across a library of 7500 RNA constructs containing two-way junctions with known 3D structures. DMS reactivity exists on a continuum over four orders of magnitude, with ∼10% overlap between WC and non-WC nucleotides. Non-WC bases with WC-like protection exhibit increased hydrogen bonding and decreased solvent accessibility, whereas reactive WC pairs tend to flank junctions, correlating with weaker base stacking and greater junction dynamics. Reactivity in noncanonical pairs correlates with specific atomic distances, allowing discrimination among base-pair conformations. These underlying reactivity-distance correlations are independently reproduced under in vivo-like probing conditions (37°C, 2 min). Using a single reactivity-derived distance constraint in Rosetta Full-Atom Refinement (FARFAR) recovers native A-G base-pair conformations and lowers root-mean-square deviation to high-resolution structures. These results establish that DMS reactivity provides predictive geometric information for RNA 3D modeling.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.