Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42464707›Full record

ArticleNursing open2026

From Trust to Betrayal: Imposter Nurses and Nursing Quackery in Nigeria, Their Threat to Patient Safety, and the Role of Professionalism: A Cross-Sectional Survey.

Benjamin Olusola Ajibade, Isaiah Dada Owoeye, Abiola Ogunniyi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nursing open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Benjamin Olusola AjibadeFaculty of Health and Wellbeing, School of Healthcare and Nursing Sciences, Northumbria University, Newcastle, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0204-4205
Isaiah Dada OwoeyeNursing Image and Standards Support Initiative of Nigeria (NISSIN), Nurses House, Abeokuta, Nigeria.
Abiola OgunniyiNursing Image and Standards Support Initiative of Nigeria (NISSIN), Nurses House, Abeokuta, Nigeria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-5432-8503

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNursing quackery; the unlicensed practice of nursing by unqualified individuals poses a major threat to patient safety and nursing integrity in Nigeria. Despite a regulatory council, systemic enforcement failures continue to enable imposters to operate countrywide.

aimTo examine perceptions of nursing quackery in Nigeria, assess registered nurses' professional values, professionalism, trust, and ethical practice, and identify predictors of quackery awareness.

methodsA cross-sectional survey of 618 registered nurses recruited across all six Nigerian geopolitical zones used multistage sampling. Data were collected using the Nigerian Nursing Professionalism and Quackery Assessment Tool (NNPQAT), adapted from the Nurses' Professional Values Scale-Revised (NPVS-R), Hall's Professionalism Scale, the Trust in Nurses Scale, and the Ethical Behaviour Rating Scale. Chi-square tests, Spearman's rho correlations, and multiple linear regression were performed using SPSS version 29.

resultsParticipants demonstrated high professional values (M = 4.76, SD = 0.44), professionalism (M = 4.76, SD = 0.58), ethical practice (M = 4.84, SD = 0.59), and trust (M = 4.53, SD = 0.59). Quackery awareness was widespread (M = 4.53, SD = 0.58); 96.1% agreed quackery threatens patient safety and 97.1% agreed it damages public trust. Awareness did not vary by region (χ

conclusionsNigerian registered nurses exhibit strong professional values, yet quackery persists as a system-level failure rooted in regulatory weakness rather than individual professional deficit. Ethical practice functions as professional vigilance, heightening sensitivity to quackery. Strengthening Nursing and Midwifery Council of Nigeria (NMCN) enforcement, investing in ethics education, and developing public awareness campaigns are essential to protect patients and preserve professional integrity. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING PRACTICE OR EDUCATION: These findings call for heightened regulatory vigilance among registered nurses, nurse educators, and healthcare administrators in identifying and reporting suspected nursing quackery. Pre-registration and continuing professional development curricula should embed ethics education that develops professional vigilance, recognising that ethical orientation, not seniority or years of experience, is the strongest driver of quackery awareness. Clinical and educational leaders should establish routine credential verification practices at ward and facility level, supported by safe, protected reporting mechanisms for nurses who identify unqualified colleagues. Nurse educators are encouraged to incorporate public awareness content into community health teaching, equipping the public to verify nursing credentials and recognise warning signs of fraudulent practice. These actions are relevant across all facility types and regions, given the uniform national distribution of quackery awareness identified in this study. NO PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: This study did not involve patients, service users, caregivers, or members of the public in its design, conduct, data analysis, or manuscript preparation. The study population comprised registered nursing professionals only, recruited as expert informants on the phenomenon of nursing quackery in Nigeria. Patient and public involvement was not applicable to this study.

Indexed as

NursesPatient SafetyProfessionalismProfessional MisconductTrustAdultAttitude of Health PersonnelCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNigeriaSurveys and Questionnairesethical practicehealthcare regulationNigerianursing quackerypatient safetyprofessionalismtrust

Identifiers

PMID42464707
PMCPMC13377210

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.