ArticleWater environment research : a research publication of the Water Environment Federation2026
The Microbiota of Evaporative Cooling Systems and the Impact of Rainwater as an Alternative Water Source.
Article in Water environment research : a research publication of the Water Environment Federation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Climate change and an increasing global population are supposed to cause progressive water shortages in the future. Using rainwater in water tanks for evaporative cooling systems as a substitute might help reduce water consumption needed for cooling. Therefore, our study identified the present microbiota in evaporative cooling systems (ECS) and used an ex situ approach to identify effects of the substitution of tap water with rainwater. Culturable cell counts (CCC) based on colony-forming units for total counts or selected pathogens, total biofilm masses based on crystal violet staining, and the bacterial composition (16S rRNA sequencing) of biofilms sampled in different ECS were considered. Data suggest that rainwater does not enhance biofilm growth, since both culturable cells and total biofilm mass tended to decrease when using rainwater instead of tap water. Interestingly, biocide treatment slightly enhanced the total biofilm mass and CCC. Sequencing data revealed differences in the microbiota when using the different water types; yet, the community shift did not include an enrichment of typical pathogens in both cases. Overall, our results suggest that a substitution of tap water with rainwater for ECS creates no disadvantage with regard to the microbial safety and might allow a reduction of financial and resource investments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.