ArticleBipolar disorders2026
Identifying Mood Instability and Circadian Rest-Activity Patterns Using Digital Remote Monitoring and Actigraphy in Participants at Risk for Bipolar Disorder.
Article in Bipolar disorders, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Neural signatures of risk-taking adaptions across health, bipolar disorder, and lithium treatment.Molecular psychiatry · 2025Trial
- Implicit learning across varying temporal scales in individuals with and without mood instability.Journal of affective disorders · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionMood and/or affective instability and circadian rhythm disruptions are increasingly recognised in psychiatric disorders, notably bipolar disorder (BD), but their interrelationship remains unclear. By definition, both have an integral temporal component and, as such, measuring them longitudinally and remotely is desirable.
methodsWe assessed the feasibility and value of digital devices to capture mood and subjective state (affect) instability and daily rest-activity patterns over a 10-week period in two groups of participants. The first group (n = 37) scored > 7 on the Mood Disorder Questionnaire (MDQ) ('high MDQ'), indicating a history of mood elevation and increased risk for BD. They were compared with a group (n = 37) scoring < 5 on the MDQ ('low MDQ'). Over the 10-week period, mood was rated daily, clinical ratings of depression, mania and anxiety were captured weekly, and a GENEActiv actigraph was worn to collect rest-activity pattern data.
resultsThe main findings were that (1) MDQ score predicted instability in mood and subjective state; (2) high MDQ score was associated with greater negative affect, mood symptoms and altered circadian activity profiles compared with low MDQ; and (3) mood and subjective state instability appeared unrelated to circadian indices.
conclusionThese findings suggest that (1) remote monitoring of these domains is feasible and valuable; (2) selection of participants based on MDQ score is useful for studying mood and affective instability; and (3) this approach has potential utility for clinical and experimental medicine studies assessing interventions targeting mood dysregulation and affective instability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.