Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42464544›Full record

ArticleZhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery2026

[A special type of triple injury of superior shoulder suspensory complex-lateral segment floating clavicle].

Yu Chen, Hongsheng Zhao, Mingxing Yang, Shengming Xu, Yuwei Cai

Abstract readEnglish Abstract
In one paragraph

Article in Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Yu ChenDepartment of Orthopedics, Shuguang Hospital, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, 200120, P. R. China.
Hongsheng ZhaoDepartment of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Diqing Tibetan Autonomous Prefecture Tibetan Hospital, Diqing Yunnan, 674400, P. R. China.
Mingxing YangDepartment of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Diqing Tibetan Autonomous Prefecture Tibetan Hospital, Diqing Yunnan, 674400, P. R. China.
Shengming XuDepartment of Orthopedics, Shuguang Hospital, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, 200120, P. R. China.
Yuwei CaiDepartment of Orthopedics, Shuguang Hospital, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, 200120, P. R. China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the clinical characteristics and injury mechanisms of lateral segment floating clavicle (LSFC), and to establish a comprehensive classification system for this specific triple injury of the superior shoulder suspensory complex (SSSC), so as to provide a reference for clinical diagnosis and treatment. Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed on 354 patients with midclavicular fractures who underwent surgical treatment between January 2021 and December 2024. Among them, 11 patients met the diagnostic criteria for LSFC, defined as a combination of midclavicular fracture, ipsilateral coracoid process fracture or coracoclavicular ligament rupture, and ipsilateral acromioclavicular ligament rupture, distal clavicular fracture, or acromial fracture. There were 9 males and 2 females, with an age range of 21-53 years (mean, 39.3 years). LSFC was classified into two main types: Type Ⅰ was characterized by coracoclavicular ligament rupture, and type Ⅱ by coracoid process fracture. According to the injury pattern at the acromioclavicular joint-distal clavicle complex, each type was further subdivided into three subtypes: subtype a (acromioclavicular ligament rupture or acromioclavicular joint dislocation), subtype b (distal clavicular fracture), and subtype c (acromial fracture). Of the 11 patients, 4 were classified as type Ⅰa, 5 as type Ⅱa, and 2 as type Ⅱb. All patients underwent open reduction and internal fixation. Missed diagnosis occurred in 3 cases (27.3%), intraoperative revision of the surgical plan was required in 1 case, and postoperative delayed diagnosis was found in 2 cases during follow-up, with 1 patient undergoing reoperation. Results: All 11 LSFC patients were followed up 13-26 months (mean, 17.8 months). Bony union was achieved in all fractures at last follow-up. A total of 7 complications were noted: 3 cases of acromioclavicular joint subluxation, 3 cases of periprosthetic osteolysis around the clavicular hook plate, and 1 case of wire breakage. The incidence of ipsilateral multiple rib fractures in LSFC patients was 45.5% (5/11), which was significantly higher than that in patients with isolated midclavicular fractures (1.7%, 6/343) ( Conclusion: LSFC is mostly caused by high-energy trauma, with a high rate of missed diagnosis and frequent associated injuries. In particular, ipsilateral multiple rib fractures are a highly suggestive sign of LSFC. The classification system proposed in this study summarizes the characteristics of this triple injury of SSSC, which is conducive to improving clinicians' understanding of the injury and reducing the rate of missed diagnosis.

Indexed as

ClavicleFracture Fixation, InternalFractures, BoneLigaments, ArticularShoulder InjuriesAcromioclavicular JointAdultCoracoid ProcessFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesRuptureYoung Adultacromioclavicular joint dislocationacromioclavicular ligament rupturecoracoclavicular ligament rupturecoracoid process fractureMidclavicular fracturemultiple injuries of the superior shoulder suspensory complex

Identifiers

PMID42464544
PMCPMC13391923

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.