ArticlePhysiologia plantarum
Diel Measurement Timing, Dark Acclimation and Sample Handling Alter Interpretation of OJIP Chlorophyll a Fluorescence Under Field Conditions.
Article in Physiologia plantarum. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
OJIP chlorophyll a fluorescence is widely used for the rapid assessment of photosynthetic performance, but field workflows may alter the physiological state of the plants probed before the saturating pulse. We compared eight dark-acclimation and sample-handling workflows in field-grown Sida hermaphrodita and Miscanthus × giganteus: daytime clip acclimation, evening and night measurements with or without clip acclimation, flashlight-assisted night measurements, and detached-shoot measurements after laboratory green-light exposure. The same marked leaves were measured sequentially, and the analysis focused on primary OJIP fluorescence levels, phase-specific O-J, J-I and I-P kinetics, area above the transient, FV/FM and FK/FJ. Workflow choice altered OJIP trajectories in both species. Evening and night workflows generally increased the area above the transient relative to the Day-clip method, indicating that short daytime clip acclimation and prolonged natural darkness did not produce equivalent reference states. Night-flashlight and Detached-green workflows introduced further deviations, including altered FO, changed? O-J behavior and I-P rise kinetics. The magnitude and direction of workflow effects were species-specific. These results show that dark-acclimation timing, pre-measurement light exposure and detached-shoot handling are not interchangeable technical details in field OJIP measurements. Workflows should therefore be selected according to the biological question, kept constant within comparisons, and reported with timing, dark-acclimation duration, light exposure and handling conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.