ArticleBrain and behavior2026
Reward and Imitation in Social Conformity.
Article in Brain and behavior, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeNormative social conformity has been proposed to elicit a hedonic reward signal that is dissociable from informational inferences about decision outcomes. If present, such a signal should reinforce not just the decision that preceded it but also incidental, contextual, and stimulus features. Here, we pit this account against a non-hedonic imitation algorithm.
methodAcross two studies (n = 359), we used a nondeceptive three-participant gambling task in which trial-by-trial information was provided about the selections and monetary payoffs of two other participants facing the same, recurring, options in real time. We use computational cognitive modeling to assess the relative contributions of monetary reward, social reward, and non-hedonic imitation to norm alignment.
findingsConsistent with both social reward and imitation accounts, but contrary to mere monetary maximization, the probability of staying with a losing option increased with the degree of decision unanimity. However, contrary to the social reward hypothesis, only monetary payoffs modulated the valence of incidental gambling stimuli. A hybrid weighted sum of the two models failed to improve on imitation performance, and a prosocial framing did not significantly alter the pattern of results.
conclusionsOur findings suggest a prominent role for non-valanced imitative processes in normative conformity. Future work will address how social and informational constraints shape the roles of imitation and reward in social conformity and observational learning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.