ArticleArchives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique2026
Spatiotemporal trends in food deserts, food swamps and food environments around schools in Wallonia, Belgium (2008-2024).
Article in Archives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundFood environments influence dietary behaviors and nutritional health outcomes. Food deserts, areas characterized by limited spatial access to healthy foods, and food swamps, areas where unhealthy outlets predominate, present challenges to the adoption and maintenance of a healthy diet. This study analyzed trends in access to healthy and unhealthy food environments in neighborhoods and around schools in Wallonia, Belgium, over the period 2008-2024. The region remains understudied and offers a particularly insightful case due to its mix of urban and rural areas.
methodsWe combined data on geocoded food outlets (Locatus database), short chain initiatives (LogCiCa), schools, road networks, residential addresses and area socio-demographic characteristics to identify and quantify food deserts, food swamps and the food environment within 1000m around schools across the study region. Potential food deserts were defined as areas lacking a supermarket within 1000 m road distance and a bus stop within 500 m, while actual food deserts additionally required high proportions of low-income households or elderly (65 years and older). Food swamps were quantified using the modified Retail Food Environment Index (mRFEI). Food environments around 4,696 schools were assessed using 1000 m road-network buffers. Temporal trends were evaluated using linear regression.
resultsBetween 2008 and 2024, approximately 11% of households lived in potential food deserts, with fewer than 2% residing in actual food deserts. In contrast, food swamps were widespread: in 2024, 52.2% of households were located in sectors where unhealthy outlets outnumbered healthy ones. Sectors with high proportions of elderly residents or children were disproportionately affected. Around secondary schools, traditional fresh food retailers declined substantially (fruit and vegetable stores - 60%), while takeaway and delivery outlets increased threefold. By 2024, over 90% of secondary schools were located in predominantly unhealthy food environments within walking distance.
conclusionsIn Wallonia, exposure to unhealthy food environments is widespread and persistent, particularly around schools and in socio-demographically vulnerable areas, while food deserts remain relatively rare. Policy efforts addressing the density and spatial distribution of unhealthy outlets may contribute to reducing dietary inequalities and improving population health.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.