ArticlePorcine health management2026
Vaccination against Lawsonia intracellularis reduced tail-biting related behaviors in a commercial pig herd.
Article in Porcine health management, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundLawsonia intracellularis is the causative agent of proliferative enteropathy, a common enteric disease in pigs that compromises intestinal integrity and may influence behavior through inflammation and immune activation. Its potential link to tail biting, an abnormal behavior that causes stress, injury and pain, remains unexplored. This study evaluated the effect of vaccination against L. intracellularis on tail-biting related behaviors, tail lesions, active behaviors, and postures in pigs reared under commercial conditions.
methodsThe study compared two groups in a commercial herd naturally and subclinically infected with L. intracellularis: pigs vaccinated against L. intracellularis at 5 weeks of age and unvaccinated controls each comprising 21 pens observed from 11 to 28 weeks of age. Pigs had intact tails. L. intracellularis DNA in feces and specific antibodies in blood were detected by qPCR and ELISA, respectively. Tail-biting related behaviors (rear-end nosing and tail manipulation) were quantified by video analysis (n = 42 pens). Tail lesions were assessed weekly and individually for each pig (n = 516 pigs) using a standardized scoring system. Active behaviors (exploration, feeding, social interactions) and postures were recorded as additional behavioral measures. Haptoglobin (Hp), C-reactive protein (CRP), total esterase activity (TEA) and adenosine deaminase (ADA) were analyzed in blood or saliva. Mortality and average daily gain (ADG) were registered. Ethical welfare management measures (temporary space increase, tail spraying, and enrichment) were applied when recurrent or repeated bleeding from the tail was observed.
resultsL. intracellularis was detected between 15 weeks of age and 24 weeks of age. During this period, vaccinated pigs exhibited lower frequency of tail-biting related behaviors, whereas tail lesion scores did not differ between groups. Unvaccinated control pigs explored enrichment more frequently and were sporadically more active and restless while vaccinated pigs spent more time at the feeder. ADA concentrations were higher in vaccinated pigs, while Hp, CRP, TEA, mortality, and ADG did not differ (p > 0.05).
conclusionsUnder natural subclinical Lawsonia intracellularis infection, vaccinated pigs demonstrated fewer tail-biting related behaviors and lower levels of active behaviors compared with unvaccinated controls. Although tail lesion rates were similar between groups, likely due to effective welfare management measures, the observed behavioral differences suggest that vaccination against L. intracellularis can enhance pig welfare even in the absence of clinical disease. Therefore, controlling subclinical enteric infections through vaccination may serve as an indirect yet practical complementary strategy to reduce tail-biting related behaviors on commercial pig farms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42464392What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.