SynthesisBMC global and public health2026
Implementation science frameworks and strategies to promote adoption of and adherence to oncology clinical practice guidelines in low- and middle-income countries: a scoping review.
Synthesis in BMC global and public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
20 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundClinical practice guidelines (CPGs) were developed to standardize and optimize cancer care delivery in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). The aim of this scoping review is to identify implementation science (IS) frameworks and strategies to promote CPG adoption and adherence in LMICs.
methodsWe identified studies that describe, develop, reference, or utilize IS frameworks or strategies to deliver or evaluate adoption of oncology CPGs in LMICs. Using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR), we searched Medline, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), African Journals Online, Latin American and Caribbean Health Sciences Literature, Scopus, Web of Science, and PsycINFO on 3/21/2022, 12/20/2022, 01/26/2024, and 10/03/2025. Publications in all languages and of all study types were eligible for inclusion. Titles, abstracts, and full text were screened by two reviewers with conflicts resolved by a third reviewer. Excluded studies did not use an IS framework or strategy, did not focus on cancer care, or were conducted in a high-income country.
resultsSearches identified 17,806 unique publications for title/abstract screening. 182 studies met criteria for full-text review; 35 were included. Twenty-four studies were country-specific, most commonly India (n = 5) and Nigeria (n = 5). The most frequent CPGs referenced were national/country-specific guidelines (n = 13) and Breast Health Global Initiative (BHGI) guidelines (n = 9). Only 16 full-text publications described original research to promote or evaluate evidence-based CPG interventions in LMICs. Established IS frameworks used in more than one study were the Exploration, Preparation, Implementation, and Sustainment (EPIS) framework (n = 2) and Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) (n = 2).
conclusionsThere is limited research utilizing IS frameworks and strategies to promote CPG adoption and adherence in LMICs and substantial heterogeneity in reporting. Greater utilization of IS frameworks, strengthening implementation capacity and improving consistency in reporting, are needed to improve CPG uptake in LMICs. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: Open Science Framework (https://osf.io/nb75s).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.