Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42464355›Full record

ReviewResearch involvement and engagement2026

Ripple effects of a patient & health-system partnered engagement project: a co-developed protocol.

Isabella Chana, Zeenat Ladak, Stella Medvedyuk, Abimbola Saka, Bikila Amenu, Howard Freedman, Tara Jeji, Vinesha Ramasamy, Jean-Claude Camus, Aisha Lofters and 16 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Research involvement and engagement, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

26 authors.

Isabella Chana *Women's College Hospital Research & Innovation Institute, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Zeenat Ladak *Women's College Hospital Research & Innovation Institute, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Stella MedvedyukWomen's College Hospital Research & Innovation Institute, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Abimbola SakaWomen's College Hospital Research & Innovation Institute, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Bikila AmenuResearch Advisory Council, Advancing Cancer Care Equity (ACCE) Lab, Women's College Hospital Research & Innovation Institute, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Howard FreedmanResearch Advisory Council, Advancing Cancer Care Equity (ACCE) Lab, Women's College Hospital Research & Innovation Institute, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Tara JejiResearch Advisory Council, Advancing Cancer Care Equity (ACCE) Lab, Women's College Hospital Research & Innovation Institute, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Vinesha RamasamyResearch Advisory Council, Advancing Cancer Care Equity (ACCE) Lab, Women's College Hospital Research & Innovation Institute, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Jean-Claude CamusResearch Advisory Council, Advancing Cancer Care Equity (ACCE) Lab, Women's College Hospital Research & Innovation Institute, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Aisha LoftersWomen's College Hospital Research & Innovation Institute, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Annemarie EdwardsCancer Strategy and Innovation, Canadian Cancer Society, Ontario, ON, Canada.
Christian FinleyThoracic Surgery, St. Joseph's Healthcare, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Dayne RicheSaskatchewan Cancer Agency, Saskatchewan, Canada.
Gary C BlochDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Jackie ManthorneCanadian Cancer Survivor Network, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Janet ParsonsDepartment of Occupational Science and Occupational Therapy, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Jasmine HochmanNova Scotia Association of Black Social Workers, Halifax, NS, Canada.
Jess RogersAssociation of Family Health Teams of Ontario, Ontario, ON, Canada.
Jessica MoffatPrograms & Health System Partnerships, Lung Health Foundation, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Joyce Nyhof-YoungDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Peter SelbyCampbell Family Mental Health Research Institute, Centre for Addictions & Mental Health, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Shari DworkinCanadian Partnership Against Cancer, Ontario, ON, Canada.
Sherry EspinDaphne Cockwell School of Nursing, Toronto Metropolitan University, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Vanessa ReddittDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Vanessa WrightCrossroads Clinic, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Ambreen SayaniWomen's College Hospital Research & Innovation Institute, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada. Ambreen.Sayani@wchospital.ca.

Funding

CIHR TLP-185094
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEngaging knowledge users, including patient partners and health-system partners, in embedded health services research is increasingly recognized as essential for strengthening the relevance of research and improving the quality and equity of health services and is foundational to the success of team science. Existing engagement frameworks, however, often capture experiences at single time points and do not fully reflect relational dimensions over time such as trust, reciprocity, shared decision-making, and equity which can impact the outputs and outcomes of partnered research. There remains limited evidence describing how engagement unfolds or what conditions support or hinder meaningful, equitable partnerships in research. This study will address this gap by examining the ripple effects of a long-standing researcher-knowledge user partnership and identifying the relational and structural factors that sustain it.

methodsThis qualitative, participatory study will be guided by critical patient-oriented research (cPOR), an approach that centres equity, shares power, and structurally situates lived/living experiences throughout the research process. In alignment with cPOR principles, patient partners and health-system partners are co-researchers across all stages of the study from inception through to development of data collection tools and will partner in analysis and interpretation. The study will be conducted within the Lung Health Equity Advisory Committee, a partnership co-established to address inequities in lung health, where patient partners, clinicians, policymakers, program implementers, and researchers have worked together since 2020. Data collection will be informed by patient engagement tools, such as the Engaging with Purpose Patient Engagement Framework, to assess experiences across five pillars: Co-Build, Support, Mutual Respect, Inclusiveness, and Impact, using document analysis and annual surveys. Analysis will be guided by the theoretical concept of ripple effects, to explore how engagement processes, outputs, and outcomes accumulate and influence subsequent phases of work. Data will be analysed using combined deductive-inductive content analysis, with triangulation across all data sources. Preliminary findings will be synthesized with partners through Ripple Effects Mapping (REM), a participatory approach that supports collective interpretation, visualization of impact pathways, and opportunities for continuous improvement. DISCUSSION: This study offers a novel approach to understanding the experiences and impact of long-standing research-knowledge user partnerships that are not bound by a specific project or timeline. By exploring this relational approach to engagement, we will generate nuanced insights into how knowledge-user engagement is built, experienced, and adapted over time within an equity-oriented partnership. The exploration of ripple effects is expected to strengthen real-time learning and partnership dynamics while offering a transferable model for other research teams seeking to embed iterative, partner-guided improvement into engagement practices that are sustained over time.

Indexed as

Patient engagementPatient-oriented researchRipple effectsTeam science

Identifiers

PMID42464355
PMCPMC13378006

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.