ArticleCancer cell international2026
A multi-omics prognostic model integrating disulfidptosis-related molecular features in colorectal cancer.
Article in Cancer cell international, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundDisulfidptosis is a recently described cell-death-related process associated with intracellular disulfide stress and may be relevant to tumor progression and immune regulation. However, its prognostic significance and broader biological relevance in colorectal cancer (CRC) remain unclear.
methodsTranscriptomic and clinical data from TCGA and GEO cohorts were systematically integrated to characterize disulfidptosis-related molecular patterns in CRC. A four-gene prognostic signature was developed in a randomly assigned training cohort and evaluated in the corresponding internal test cohort. Public datasets were further used for gene-level expression analysis, and survival associations were assessed in the GSE39582 cohort. Immune infiltration, tumor mutation burden, microsatellite instability, and estimated drug-sensitivity analyses were performed to explore the biological correlates and therapeutic-response-related patterns associated with the model. The four model genes were further examined using single-cell RNA-seq data and public immunohistochemical images from the Human Protein Atlas, and were preliminarily assessed in 11 paired CRC tissues and matched adjacent normal tissues by RT-qPCR and western blotting.
resultsA four-gene signature consisting of SPINK1, GPRASP1, TIMP1, and KRT6A stratified patients into prognostically distinct risk groups. The high-risk group showed poorer survival, higher tumor mutation burden, higher TIDE scores, and elevated stromal, immune, and ESTIMATE scores, suggesting a more immune-evasive tumor microenvironment. Enrichment analyses indicated that high-risk tumors were associated with extracellular matrix remodeling and PI3K-Akt-related pathways, whereas low-risk tumors were enriched in metabolic processes. Estimated drug-sensitivity analyses indicated agent-specific differences between the two risk groups. The high-risk group showed lower estimated IC50 values for several cytotoxic and targeted agents, including cisplatin, docetaxel, doxorubicin, etoposide, vinorelbine, nilotinib, and gefitinib, whereas the low-risk group showed lower estimated IC50 values for AKT inhibitor VIII, sorafenib, lapatinib, erlotinib, and BIBW2992.
conclusionsThis study identified a four-gene prognostic signature associated with disulfidptosis-related molecular heterogeneity in CRC. The signature was associated with survival differences, distinct tumor microenvironmental features, and divergent biological programs across risk groups, while KRT6A showed the most consistent pattern across public-dataset analyses and tissue-level analyses. These findings support the potential relevance of this subtype-guided signature to prognostic stratification in CRC and identify related genes for further biological investigation and independent validation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.