ArticleBMC nursing2026
Nurses' stigmatizing attitudes toward patients with substance use disorders and their impact on care quality.
Article in BMC nursing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Effectiveness of Educational Programmes on Knowledge and Practice Related to Diabetic Foot Care Among Nurses: A Systematic Review.Endocrinology, diabetes & metabolism · 2026Pooled it
- Mapping Multilevel Barriers and Facilitators to Inclusive Cancer Care for Sexual and Gender Minority Populations: A Scoping Review.Cancer medicine · 2026Article
- The Role of Machine Learning and Artificial Intelligence in Enhancing Critical Care Nursing Practice: A Scoping Review.Nursing in critical care · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundStigmatizing attitudes among nurses toward patients with substance use disorders (SUDs) and Opioid Use Disorder (OUD) represent a significant and pervasive barrier to equitable, patient-centered care. Despite growing recognition of addiction as a chronic, relapsing brain disease, nurses across diverse healthcare settings continue to exhibit negative perceptions, moralistic judgments, and stigmatizing language that compromise care quality, therapeutic relationships, and patient outcomes.
methodsA scoping review was conducted following the Arksey and O'Malley framework, refined by Levac and colleagues, and reported in accordance with PRISMA-ScR guidelines. Four electronic databases PubMed, Scopus, ScienceDirect, and CINAHL were searched from January 2018 to January 2026. Following systematic screening and full-text assessment, 12 peer-reviewed primary studies were included and synthesized thematically.
resultsFive overarching themes were identified: (1) the pervasiveness of nursing stigma across individual, professional, organizational, and structural levels; (2) knowledge deficits and negative professional socialization as primary antecedents of stigmatizing attitudes; (3) the direct impact of stigma and clinical language on care quality, with person-first documentation language independently associated with a fivefold increase in the odds of a documented OUD treatment plan (AOR = 5.21; 95% CI: 2.28-11.89); (4) patient-reported experiences of dehumanization, eroded trust, and treatment avoidance; and (5) evidence-based educational interventions demonstrating significant improvements in nursing attitudes and clinical role adequacy.
conclusionsNursing stigma toward patients with SUDs is a systemic, structurally embedded problem with measurable adverse consequences for care quality. Effective mitigation requires a multilevel response integrating addiction education reform, person-first language standards, implicit bias training, institutional-level policy and electronic health records reform to ensure equitable, evidence-based care for this vulnerable population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.