ArticleBMC nursing2026
Roles and professional boundaries of ward-based registered nurses without specialist wound care credentials in orthopedic surgical wound management: a qualitative study.
Article in BMC nursing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe increasing volume and complexity of orthopedic surgery have expanded the involvement of ward-based registered nurses in postoperative wound care. Although registered nurses receive foundational wound care education as part of their professional preparation, those without specialist wound care credentials may encounter challenges when managing complex orthopedic surgical wounds. Their experiences, role boundaries, and perceived support needs remain insufficiently explored. This study aimed to explore ward-based registered nurses' perceptions of their roles and professional boundaries in orthopedic surgical wound management and to identify perceived strategies for supporting their practice.
methodsA descriptive qualitative study was conducted in an orthopedic ward of a tertiary hospital in China. Fourteen ward-based registered nurses were purposively recruited and participated in semi-structured interviews. Data were analysed using Braun and Clarke's thematic analysis approach.
resultsFour themes were identified: negotiating professional boundaries within clinical hierarchies, evolving role identity in orthopedic surgical wound care, developing professional capacity for safe and responsive wound management, and sustaining practice development through continuing education and organizational support. Participants described surgical wound care as an expanding but ambiguously defined area of nursing practice. Their accounts highlighted a mismatch between foundational wound care education and the demands of complex orthopedic surgical wounds, variability in physicians' treatment preferences and local ward routines, limited decision-making authority, and inconsistent interprofessional collaboration. Participants also emphasized the importance of timely nursing involvement, clinically relevant continuing education, standardized protocols, and clearer escalation pathways for supporting safe and coordinated wound care.
conclusionsWard-based registered nurses without specialist wound care credentials make important contributions to orthopedic surgical wound management through ongoing assessment, timely dressing care, patient education, and communication with physicians and wound care specialists. However, their expanding role is shaped by unclear professional boundaries, variable local practices, limited authority in wound-related decision-making, and uneven access to continuing education. Clearer role delineation, standardized protocols, structured continuing education, and collaborative escalation pathways are needed to support safe and consistent wound care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.