Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42464236›Full record

ArticleBiomedical engineering online2026

Rehabilitation assessment approaches and technologies to measure gaze behaviour during walking in older adults and central neurological populations: a scoping review protocol.

Nicole Cesca, Damian M Manzone, Kristin E Musselman, José Zariffa, Emilia Main, Thomas P Walden

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomedical engineering online, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Nicole CescaKITE Research Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada. nicole.cesca@mail.utoronto.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0008-4849-3381
Damian M ManzoneKITE Research Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4152-0806
Kristin E MusselmanKITE Research Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8336-8211
José ZariffaKITE Research Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8842-745X
Emilia MainLibrary and Information Services, University Health Network, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, Toronto, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2554-7593
Thomas P WaldenKITE Research Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada. thomas.walden@uhn.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5702-2265

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionFalls are a frequent event among older adults and individuals with central neurological conditions. Gaze behaviour (i.e. how individuals use visual input to guide movement) plays a critical role in motor control while walking and likely contributes to fall prevention. However, existing research in this area remains fragmented. This scoping review will aim to identify how gaze behaviour is measured and utilized during gait rehabilitation among older adults and individuals with central neurological conditions. Findings will inform standardized assessment approaches and the development of interventions targeting gaze behaviour to improve walking and reduce fall risk. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This review will follow the Joanna Briggs Institute scoping review guidelines and is registered with the Open Science Framework. Studies will be included if they involve older adults (≥ 65 years) or individuals with central neurological conditions and measure gaze behaviour during walking. A comprehensive search strategy was developed in collaboration with a University Health Network Librarian and refined iteratively by the research team. Eight databases (Medline, Embase, CENTRAL, CDSR, Emcare Nursing, APA PsycINFO, Web of Science Core Collection, and CINAHL) were searched from inception to August 2025. Title and abstract screening will be followed by a full-text review to identify articles that meet the inclusion criteria. Data related to study/participant characteristics, methods for eye tracking, intervention, equipment, outcome measures, and key findings will be extracted. Methodological quality of studies will be assessed using the appropriate tool based on study design. Results will be reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews checklist.

Indexed as

Fixation, OcularNervous System DiseasesWalkingAgedHumansScoping Reviews as Topic

Identifiers

PMID42464236
PMCPMC13656576

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.