ArticleBMC public health2026
Waiting times for primary care appointments among older adults: a scoping review.
Article in BMC public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundHealthcare service waiting times have worsened due to the COVID-19 pandemic, particularly impacting older adults who need timely access to primary care to manage chronic conditions and prevent hospitalizations. This scoping review aims to fill a research gap by examining whether delays in primary care appointments for older adults occurred and, if so, how these delays have affected their access to primary care, with a focus on the role of social determinants of health.
methodsFollowing PRISMA guidelines, a systematic search was conducted across three health databases-MEDLINE (Ovid), CINAHL, and EMBASE-as well as one AI platform (typeset.io). To be included, articles needed to discuss waiting times for primary care appointments, include older adults in their target population, and be published in English since 2014. Non-English articles were excluded due to language proficiency constraints among the review team. The review also examined the impact of social determinants of health on equity in access to care.
resultsThis review identified a significant lack of research on primary care waiting times for older adults, with only twelve studies addressing the issue. Findings indicate that prolonged wait times act as a major barrier to accessing timely care, resulting in patient frustration, delayed treatment, and increased reliance on emergency services. The COVID-19 pandemic has exacerbated these challenges, particularly through care interruptions and the shift to virtual care, which is understudied regarding its impact on waiting times.
conclusionsProlonged waiting times for primary care disproportionately affect older adults, exacerbated by age-related health conditions and intersecting social determinants. Healthcare systems must address these barriers and prioritize research into tailored interventions to ensure equitable access to care for older adults.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.