SynthesisBMC public health2026
Effects of controlled, acute exposure to air pollutants on heart rate variability in humans: a meta-regression and methodological recommendations.
Synthesis in BMC public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe consequences of air pollution on cardiovascular disease (CVD) are heavily supported. One proposed mechanism that underpins the development of many CVD-related pathologies is autonomic imbalance, which can be measured through the high frequency (HF) component of heart rate variability (HRV). Despite evidence suggesting that air pollution reduces HRV, findings remain inconsistent across varying exposure durations and study designs.
objectiveThis meta-regression addressed the question: Is there a dose-response relationship between controlled pollutant exposure duration (in hours), compared to filtered air, and autonomic imbalance (HF component of HRV) in adult humans?
methodsWe searched PubMed, Scopus, and Embase for cross-over or randomized controlled trials involving adults exposed to both a filtered air and air pollutant condition in controlled environments. These studies needed to report HF before and after exposure. Quality, bias, and certainty of evidence were assessed using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme checklist, the Cochrane risk-of-bias 2 tool, and the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation framework, respectively. We used a restricted cubic spline (RCS) model to estimate the standardized mean difference (SMD) of exposure duration (in hours) on the HF component of HRV.
resultsThis meta-regression included u=27 studies, from which we extracted k=55 effect sizes, representing n=747 participants. The RCS modelling indicated that study-level exposure duration was negatively associated with HRV, with studies using longer exposure protocols reporting a minor pooled decrease in HRV relative to filtered air controls (SMD=-0.221 [-0.365, -0.077], p=0.003). Only study bias significantly moderated the effect of exposure hour on HRV (p=0.084). DISCUSSION: These findings suggest a duration-dependent association at the study level, with greater pooled decreases in HRV (HF) observed in studies employing exposure protocols beyond 3 hours. This work also assessed critical study design considerations including exposure duration, pollutant types, disease states, publication quality/bias, and exercise protocols to provide methodological suggestions. These recommendations are essential for reducing variation in future cross-over studies and refining CVD-related air quality policies. This meta-regression was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42023470139) and was supported in part by the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences of the National Institutes of Health [T32ES011564; R01ES029846; P42ES023716].
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.