Observational studyBMC emergency medicine2026
Ejection fraction and absolute delta troponin in the early emergency department assessment of high coronary disease burden in NSTEMI patients: a retrospective observational study.
Observational study in BMC emergency medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPatients with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) are commonly evaluated first in the emergency department, where early estimation of coronary disease burden may support clinical risk assessment before invasive coronary angiography. This study investigated whether routinely available emergency department parameters, with particular emphasis on ejection fraction (EF) and absolute delta troponin, were associated with high angiographic coronary disease burden assessed by the Gensini score.
methodsThis retrospective observational study included adult NSTEMI patients admitted to the emergency department of a tertiary care hospital between January 1, 2024, and May 1, 2025, who subsequently underwent coronary angiography. Patients were divided into low and high Gensini groups using a predefined threshold of 40. Demographic characteristics, comorbidities, laboratory variables, echocardiographic findings, and absolute changes in serial troponin measurements were compared between groups. Independent associations with the high Gensini category were evaluated using multivariable binary logistic regression. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was used to assess the discriminatory performance of EF and absolute delta troponin/100.
resultsA total of 394 patients were included in the final analysis; 209 were classified into the low Gensini group and 185 into the high Gensini group. In the adjusted model, lower EF was independently associated with the high Gensini category (OR: 0.888; 95% CI: 0.859-0.918; p < 0.001), while higher absolute delta troponin/100 showed a positive independent association (OR: 1.161; 95% CI: 1.074-1.254; p < 0.001). Diabetes mellitus was also independently associated with the high Gensini category (OR: 1.851; 95% CI: 1.096-3.127; p = 0.021). EF and absolute delta troponin/100 both showed statistically significant discrimination for the high Gensini category, with AUC values of 0.783 and 0.758, respectively.
conclusionsIn NSTEMI patients evaluated in the emergency department, lower EF and higher absolute delta troponin were independently associated with high angiographic coronary disease burden. EF showed slightly higher discriminatory performance than absolute delta troponin/100. These findings suggest that EF and absolute troponin change may provide complementary information during early emergency department assessment before coronary angiography, although they should not be interpreted as validated predictors of clinical outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.