ArticleBMC primary care2026
Patient-specific variables predicting triage outcomes of ear, nose, throat referrals from primary care for dysphonia.
Article in BMC primary care, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPatients with dysphonia are referred to Speech-Language Pathologists (SLP) or Ear Nose and Throat (ENT) surgeons from General Practitioners (GPs) for specialist assessment. Accurate referral information is needed to determine the assessment-pathway and priority. This study aimed to examine which patient-specific information provided in GP referral documents predicted clinicians' triage outcomes.
methodsThis was an IRB-approved retrospective study of electronic medical records of 150 voice-disordered adults aged ≥ 18 years referred to a tertiary hospital specialist ENT department between March 1, 2019, and July 1, 2020. Data collected included demographics, voice symptoms, risk factors, and medical history. ENT clinicians triaged all patients to either SLP or ENT assessment-pathway and recommended a priority categorisation. The predictive values of documented information in the referral on assessment triage outcome were analysed using logistic regression.
resultsEighty referrals reported hoarseness as the only symptom, only eight reported three or more symptoms. Female gender, previous smoking history, and current smoking history significantly predicted the ENT-pathway for initial assessment. The same variables plus previous thyroid surgery significantly predicted triage to high-priority assessment. However, a quarter of referral letters did not include information about smoking and alcohol consumption.
conclusionGender and smoking history were significant predictors of triage outcomes. No significant association was found between referral symptoms and the triage outcomes. The exclusion of relevant lifestyle and health information likely impacted decision-making at triage. More detailed information specific to voice disorder risk factors included in GP written referrals may provide critical missing details required to prioritise referrals accurately.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.