ArticleBMC microbiology2026
Carriage and susceptibility of Enterobacteria isolated from the local chickens at markets and peri-urban areas of Bobo-Dioulasso, Burkina Faso.
Article in BMC microbiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSalmonella and Escherichia coli are among the main causes of foodborne illness and negatively impact poultry industry. The aim of this study is to determine the carriage rate and sensitivity of Enterobacteria isolated from the cloacae of chickens. Samples were taken only from healthy local chickens of markets (55 samples) and outlying areas (45 samples) using the swabbing technique. The swabs were pre-enriched and inoculated onto Hektoen agar at 37 °C for 24 h. Bacteria and resistance genes were identified through molecular biology. Antimicrobial susceptibility was tested by Kirby Bauer method.
resultsThe overall prevalence was 65% for Escherichia coli and 27% for Salmonella sp. after biochemical tests and these carrying rates of these strains were 10% for Salmonella and 53% for Escherichia coli after molecular confirmation tests. E. coli isolates (n = 53), 91.43% (32/35) originated from farms, while 75% (21/28) were collected from markets. The detection of the 16S rRNA gene was higher in market samples (25%) compared to farm samples (8.57%). Antibiotic susceptibility testing showed extremely high resistance rates to amoxicillin (> 93%) and tetracycline (> 80%) in both bacterial species. In contrast, high susceptibility rates were recorded to ceftriaxone (> 90%) and norfloxacin (> 89%). Moderate resistance levels were observed to cotrimoxazole and amoxicillin-clavulanic acid Augmentin (> 41%). Comparative statistical analysis between bacterial species showed no statistically significant difference for most antibiotics (p > 0.05). Among Escherichia coli isolates, 58.49% (31/53) exhibited a penicillinase phenotype, compared with 60% (6/10) of Salmonella spp. and ESBL phenotypes were detected in 35.80% (19/53) of E. coli isolates and 40% (4/10) of Salmonella spp. isolates. No statistically significant difference was observed between the species. The bla
conclusionThis study highlighted the presence of strains Enterobacteria resistant to many antimicrobials of therapeutic importance in healthy chickens. For the well-being of consumers, it is necessary to strengthen surveillance and prevention systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.