ArticleBMC geriatrics2026
Development and validation of a routine blood test-based model to predict in-hospital postoperative pulmonary infection in older patients with hip fracture.
Article in BMC geriatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPostoperative pulmonary infection (PPI) is a common and serious complication in older adults undergoing hip fracture surgery, leading to prolonged hospitalization, increased costs, and increased mortality. However, simple and reliable preoperative predictors remain limited. Therefore, this study aimed to develop and validate a hematology-based machine learning model for the early prediction of PPI in older hip fracture patients.
methodsA total of 3,944 patients aged ≥ 60 years who underwent hip fracture surgery were retrospectively enrolled from three cohorts: the discovery cohort (n = 1,745, Shanghai Xuhui Central Hospital, 2016-2020), the internal validation cohort (n = 1,306, 2021-2024), and the external validation cohort (n = 893, Shanghai Putuo People's Hospital, 2016-2024). Twenty-four preoperative hematologic variables were analyzed. Six supervised machine learning algorithms were compared via fivefold cross-validation. Model performance was evaluated by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, F1 score, calibration, and decision curve analysis (DCA).
resultsPatients who developed PPI were generally older and exhibited a neutrophil-dominant inflammatory profile, characterized by higher white blood cell counts, neutrophil, monocyte, platelet, and C-reactive protein levels, and lower lymphocyte, eosinophil, and basophil percentages (all p < 0.001). Among the evaluated algorithms, the extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) model achieved the best overall performance, with AUCs of 1.00, 0.96, and 0.98 in the discovery, internal, and external cohorts, respectively. Calibration curves suggested good agreement between predicted and observed probabilities, and DCA indicated favorable clinical net benefit across threshold probabilities.
conclusionsA hematology-based XGBoost model was developed to predict in-hospital PPI in older adults following hip fracture surgery. The model demonstrated good discriminative performance and interpretability in this study cohort, suggesting its potential utility as a supplementary tool for cost-effective perioperative risk stratification. However, further prospective validation in diverse populations and healthcare settings is required to confirm its generalizability and clinical applicability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.