ArticleBMC bioinformatics2026
A deep learning architecture for combining and imputing heterogeneous metabolomics datasets.
Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Public metabolomics databases offer a large number of datasets. Combined analysis of these data sets may better capture complex molecular mechanisms in diseases. However, most datasets include measurements for only a very small fraction of the known metabolites. Hence, simply putting together these studies leads to very sparse datasets, which do not lend themselves well to training machine learning models. In this paper, we propose two novel approaches for dataset merging and imputation model training: (i) Iterative similarity-based merging generates an optimal merge set for each dataset and makes sure that a minimum sparsity threshold is maintained, and (ii) Model-guided agglomerative merging combines datasets in pairs to create a single large dataset in an attempt to effectively combine diverse metabolomics datasets while minimizing the likelihood of gaps created by non-overlapping metabolites. In both approaches, after creating joint datasets, Variational autoencoders (VAE) are employed for imputation model training. We evaluate our approach on the entire set of public datasets from the Metabolomics workbench. Our results demonstrate that the proposed approaches achieve significantly better imputation performance than the state-of-the-art approach.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.