Observational studyBMC microbiology2026
Vaginal PRA1 identifies clinically relevant Candida albicans vaginitis and excludes asymptomatic colonization: an exploratory study.
Observational study in BMC microbiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05895162 (Randomized Controlled Trial to Assess the Effectiveness of a Zinc-containing Vaginal Gel and Fluconazole on Treatment and Recurrence of Vulvovaginal Candidiasis.), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Randomized Controlled Trial to Assess the Effectiveness of a Zinc-containing Vaginal Gel and Fluconazole on Treatment and Recurrence of Vulvovaginal Candidiasis.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAccurate interpretation of Candida detection in women with vulvovaginal symptoms remains difficult, because organism recovery may reflect either clinically relevant infection or nonpathogenic colonization. We have recently demonstrated that the secreted fungal zinc-binding protein, Pra1 is responsible for driving the inflammatory immunopathology of VVC. We therefore reasoned that PRA1 expression by Candida albicans in the vagina may act as a diagnostic tool to discriminate between commensal colonisation and active disease.
methodsWe conducted a 12-week prospective, single-center exploratory biomarker analysis nested within a registered parent clinical trial. Nine women with vulvovaginal symptoms provided cervicovaginal lavage samples and clinical data at baseline and at weeks 4, 8, and 12. This report does not present the primary efficacy analysis of the randomized trial. At each visit, Candida culture status and clinical severity score (CSS) were recorded. Symptomatic Candida vaginitis was defined as Candida culture positivity with CSS ≥ 3 at the same visit. Species identification of fungal isolates was performed by MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry, and vaginal PRA1 was quantified by SYBR Green real-time qPCR. Vaginal PRA1 concentrations were assessed as a time-varying same-visit biomarker using repeated-measures approaches, non-parametric comparisons, correlation analyses, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves.
resultsPRA1 concentrations were substantially higher in Candida culture-positive than in culture-negative samples (median 4,011 vs. 21.5 pg/µL, p = 3.99 × 10⁻⁵). PRA1 was also higher in samples meeting criteria for symptomatic Candida vaginitis than in asymptomatic culture-negative samples (median 11,762 vs. 21.5 pg/µL, p = 8.15 × 10⁻⁵). Among culture-positive observations, PRA1 was associated with symptom severity (Spearman rho = 0.67; Pearson r = 0.56 after log10 transformation). Same-visit discrimination was high in this cohort for both Candida culture positivity and symptomatic Candida vaginitis (AUC approximately 0.95 for each outcome). In this small exploratory cohort, lower PRA1 thresholds achieved 100% sensitivity and negative predictive value for clinically significant Candida vaginitis. These estimates require validation in larger studies.
conclusionsThese preliminary findings suggest that vaginal PRA1 may help distinguish symptomatic Candida-associated disease from clinically insignificant Candida detection and may be particularly useful as a rule-out biomarker. Given the small sample size and exploratory design, these results should be regarded as hypothesis-generating and require validation in larger, independent cohorts. The study protocol was approved by the Hungarian National Institutional Review Medical Research Council (approval No. 3282-7/2023/EUIG). The parent trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05895162; 2023-06-08).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.