ArticleBMC genomics2026
Cross-cell-line conservation-resolved interactions reveal conservation-dependent relationships among CTCF loops.
Article in BMC genomics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The three-dimensional organization of the genome is shaped by CTCF-mediated chromatin loops, which vary widely in strength, conservation, and cell-type specificity. A longstanding model proposes that highly conserved loops form autonomously and establish a structural scaffold that supports the subsequent formation of less conserved, cell-type-specific interactions. However, genome-wide evidence for an ordered dependency among loops of different conservation levels has remained limited.Here, we tested this hierarchical model using high-resolution CTCF ChIA-PET data from eight human cell lines. We developed a two-stage predictive framework in which high-confidence loops were first identified using sequence features, chromatin context, and cross-cell-line conservation, and then augmented with neighboring-interaction features that quantify the influence of pre-existing loops at nearby CTCF anchors. Incorporation of neighboring-interaction information resulted in only modest overall improvements in predictive performance.To directly assess hierarchical dependencies, we stratified loops into eight conservation classes based on their recurrence across cell lines and systematically evaluated how neighboring interactions from each class contributed to loop prediction in others. This conservation-resolved analysis revealed a structured pattern in predictive relationships: loops within a given conservation class were most strongly predicted by neighboring loops from adjacent conservation classes. In contrast, the most highly conserved loops showed little improvement from local loop-context information.Together, these results demonstrate that the predictive value of neighboring chromatin interactions depends strongly on loop conservation and that chromatin interaction neighborhoods contain structured conservation-dependent information. More broadly, our neighboring-interaction framework provides an interpretable approach for identifying structured associations within chromatin interaction networks and for generating hypotheses regarding the organization of three-dimensional genome architecture.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.