SynthesisBMC oral health2026
The effect of surface treatment on the bonding properties of Polyetherketoneketone (PEKK) polymer to veneering materials: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in BMC oral health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThis systematic review and meta-analysis aim to compile and critically evaluate the existing published literature evaluating the effect of surface treatment on the bonding properties of the Polyetherketoneketone (PEKK) polymer to veneering materials.
methodsThe PICO (Participant, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome) question ordered for the review was: What influence do surface pretreatments have on the bond strength between PEKK resin and veneering materials? The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines served as the basis for structuring and reporting this systematic review and meta-analysis. Two independent researchers systematically searched four electronic databases (PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane) to identify all articles published up to 15th December 2025. To meet the individual requirements of each electronic database, minor alterations in the search strings were made.
resultsInitial search yielded 242 hits. After removing duplicate and irrelevant titles, the complete texts of the leftover articles were assessed, and 15 articles were ultimately selected that met the inclusion criteria. Quality analysis was performed using the Modified CONSORT scale, which indicated a high to medium level of study quality. When the GRADE approach was used to rate the quality of the evidence, it was revealed that the studies have moderate certainty. Eleven out of fifteen articles were included in the meta-analysis. For composite resin, air abrasion with alumina significantly increased shear bond strength (SBS) with a pooled standardized mean difference (SMD) of 4.79 (95% CI: 2.24, 7.34), and sulfuric acid etching showed a pooled SMD of 2.92 (95% CI: 0.40, 5.44). For lithium disilicate ceramic, air abrasion with alumina yielded an SMD of 2.70 (95% CI: 1.16, 4.24), and sulfuric acid etching an SMD of 1.75 (95% CI: 0.22, 3.27). Tribochemical silica coating also showed significant improvements. Non-thermal air plasma's effect on composite resin was not statistically significant (SMD: 0.51, 95% CI: -2.15, 3.18).
conclusionWithin the study's limitations, it can be concluded that surface pretreatment of the PEKK polymeric material is an essential step before bonding the veneering material. In vitro evidence suggests that surface pretreatments like air abrasion with 100-110 μm alumina or acid etching with 90-95% sulfuric acid demonstrate promising results for improving bond strength.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.