ArticleAddiction (Abingdon, England)2026
Real-world comparative effects of slow-release oral morphine vs. methadone on healthcare use for opioid use disorder: A population-based target trial emulation.
Article in Addiction (Abingdon, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Real-world comparative effects of slow-release oral morphine vs. methadone on healthcare use for opioid use disorder: A population-based target trial emulation.Addiction (Abingdon, England) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
aimsTo examine the comparative effects of slow-release oral morphine (SROM) vs. methadone for the treatment of opioid use disorder (OUD) on healthcare use.
designThis retrospective cohort study emulated a target trial using electronic medical record data from Vancouver Coastal Health Authority linked with population-based administrative health data from British Columbia (BC), Canada.
settingVancouver Coastal Health region in BC, between 1 July 2017 and 30 June 2024, operating under a universal healthcare system, where the majority of illicit opioids are contaminated with fentanyl.
participantsOUD patients aged between 18 and 65 years.
interventionsIntent-to-treat (ITT): receiving a new prescription of SROM or methadone for the treatment of OUD (regardless of treatment initiation or adherence). Per-protocol (PP): initiating and adhering to the prescribed SROM vs methadone (real-world on-treatment exposure). MEASUREMENTS: The daily rate of healthcare use-including all-cause and opioid-specific emergency department (ED) visits, all-cause and opioid-specific hospitalization days, all-cause physician encounters/services, OUD-related physician visits, and non-OUD-related primary care physician visits-over 1 year following treatment prescription or initiation was modelled using weighted modified Poisson regression with generalized estimating equations. Cumulative healthcare use at 1 year and corresponding adjusted rate ratios (aRRs) were estimated.
findingsWe identified 3254 unique individuals [median (Q1-Q3) age 37 (30-46) years, 64.2% male] contributing to 4059 person-trials (eligible treatment episodes) for the ITT analysis (32.6% SROM) and 1992 unique individuals contributing to 2276 person-trials for the PP analysis (27.4% SROM). ITT analysis shows that receiving a SROM vs. methadone prescription was not associated with statistically significant differences in the rates of all-cause [aRR = 1.10, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.997-1.20] and opioid-specific ED visits (aRR = 1.00, 95% CI = 0.90-1.13), all-cause (aRR = 0.99, 95% CI = 0.81-1.18) and opioid-specific hospitalization days (aRR = 0.97, 95% CI = 0.78-1.20), all-cause physician encounters/services (aRR = 1.00, 95% CI = 0.94-1.06), OUD-related physician visits (aRR = 0.94, 95% CI = 0.87-1.01) and primary care physician visits (aRR = 1.11, 95% CI = 0.98-1.24). PP analysis also did not observe statistically significant differences across healthcare outcomes among those who initiated and remained on SROM vs. methadone treatment, with aRRs of 1.24 (95% CI = 0.91-1.50), 1.01 (95% CI = 0.67-1.36), 1.06 (95% CI = 0.65-1.58), 0.95 (95% CI = 0.53-1.58), 1.03 (95% CI = 0.90-1.17), 0.97 (95% CI = 0.82-1.14) and 1.06 (95% CI = 0.73-1.46), respectively.
conclusionsThis emulated trial on opioid use disorder patients under a universal healthcare setting in Canada did not observe statistically significant differences in risk of healthcare use outcomes between the patients receiving slow-release oral morphine and those receiving methadone following treatment prescription and initiation. This supports slow-release oral morphine as a viable alternative to methadone with similar real-world effectiveness in preventing all-cause and opioid-related acute healthcare needs and the potential to expand treatment options for opioid use disorder without increasing health system burden.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.