ArticleMagnetic resonance in medicine2026
Comparative Systematic Analysis of Gray Matter Biophysical Models on a Public Dataset.
Article in Magnetic resonance in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeBiophysical models of diffusion tailored to characterize gray matter (GM) microstructure are gaining traction in the neuroimaging community. NEXI, SMEX, SANDI, and SANDIX represent recent efforts to account for different microstructural features, such as soma contributions and inter-compartment exchange, in the diffusion MRI (dMRI) signal. The purpose of this work is to provide a comparative evaluation of these four GM diffusion models.
methodsA comparative analysis of NEXI, SMEX, SANDI, and SANDIX was performed using a single, publicly available in vivo human dataset, the Connectome Diffusion Microstructure Dataset (CDMD), acquired with two diffusion times. Cortical microstructure metrics were estimated in 26 healthy subjects using the open-source Gray Matter Swiss Knife toolbox, and goodness of fit, anatomical patterns, and consistency with previous studies were evaluated.
resultsCDMD data yielded GM parameter estimates consistent with values reported in previous studies across all four models. NEXI and SMEX produced similar cortical anatomical patterns, with consistent regional distributions across diffusion times. Goodness of fit varied across models, with NEXI showing the best fit, followed by SMEX, and finally SANDIX. SANDI parameter estimates showed strong dependence on diffusion-time selection and fitting algorithm.
conclusionThis retrospective cross-model analysis establishes the feasibility of estimating exchange models from only two diffusion times and highlights trade-offs in biological specificity, model complexity, and fitting robustness, which are critical considerations when selecting a model for future clinical and research applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.