Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42464030›Full record

ArticleMagnetic resonance in medicine2026

Comparative Systematic Analysis of Gray Matter Biophysical Models on a Public Dataset.

Santiago Mezzano, Quentin Uhl, Tommaso Pavan, Jasmine Nguyen-Duc, Hansol Lee, Susie Huang, Ileana Jelescu

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Magnetic resonance in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Santiago MezzanoDepartment of Radiology, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV), Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-6705-7039
Quentin UhlDepartment of Radiology, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV), Lausanne, Switzerland.
Tommaso PavanDepartment of Radiology, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV), Lausanne, Switzerland.
Jasmine Nguyen-DucDepartment of Radiology, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV), Lausanne, Switzerland.
Hansol LeeAthinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Charlestown, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2112-1197
Susie HuangAthinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Charlestown, Massachusetts, USA.
Ileana JelescuDepartment of Radiology, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV), Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3664-0195

Funding

Swiss National Science Foundation 194260Swiss Secretariat for Education, Research and Innovation MB22.00032
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeBiophysical models of diffusion tailored to characterize gray matter (GM) microstructure are gaining traction in the neuroimaging community. NEXI, SMEX, SANDI, and SANDIX represent recent efforts to account for different microstructural features, such as soma contributions and inter-compartment exchange, in the diffusion MRI (dMRI) signal. The purpose of this work is to provide a comparative evaluation of these four GM diffusion models.

methodsA comparative analysis of NEXI, SMEX, SANDI, and SANDIX was performed using a single, publicly available in vivo human dataset, the Connectome Diffusion Microstructure Dataset (CDMD), acquired with two diffusion times. Cortical microstructure metrics were estimated in 26 healthy subjects using the open-source Gray Matter Swiss Knife toolbox, and goodness of fit, anatomical patterns, and consistency with previous studies were evaluated.

resultsCDMD data yielded GM parameter estimates consistent with values reported in previous studies across all four models. NEXI and SMEX produced similar cortical anatomical patterns, with consistent regional distributions across diffusion times. Goodness of fit varied across models, with NEXI showing the best fit, followed by SMEX, and finally SANDIX. SANDI parameter estimates showed strong dependence on diffusion-time selection and fitting algorithm.

conclusionThis retrospective cross-model analysis establishes the feasibility of estimating exchange models from only two diffusion times and highlights trade-offs in biological specificity, model complexity, and fitting robustness, which are critical considerations when selecting a model for future clinical and research applications.

Indexed as

Diffusion Magnetic Resonance ImagingGray MatterImage Processing, Computer-AssistedAdultAlgorithmsBrainConnectomeFemaleHumansMaleNeuroimagingbiophysical modelingdiffusion MRIgray matter microstructureNEXI

Identifiers

PMID42464030
PMCPMC13527255

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.