ArticleOphthalmology and therapy2026
180-Degree Nuclear Flip: A Safety and Efficacy Assessment of a Phacoemulsification Technique for Cataract Nuclei of Grade III and Below.
Article in Ophthalmology and therapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThis prospective randomized controlled trial aims to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of a 180° nuclear flip technique in phacoemulsification cataract surgery, comparing it with the traditional endocapsular approach for cataracts of Emery-Little grade III and below.
methodsA total of 142 patients were randomly assigned to either the 180° nuclear flip group (n = 71) or the conventional endocapsular phacoemulsification group (n = 71). The primary outcomes measured were total phacoemulsification time (TPT) and effective phacoemulsification time (EPT). Secondary outcomes were the incidence of postoperative corneal endothelial cell loss (ECL) at 7 and 28 days, as well as intraoperative complications including posterior capsule rupture (PCR).
resultsThe mean TPT was substantially shorter in the flip group (43.75 ± 17.16 s) compared to the conventional group (58.45 ± 22.27 s) (P < 0.0001). Similarly, the mean EPT was also significantly reduced in the flip group (11.08 ± 5.25 s vs. 14.87 ± 8.54 s, P = 0.0046). There were no PCR cases in the flip group, whereas there was one case (1.4%) in the traditional group. At 28 days postoperatively, the mean ECL rate of the flip group (3.7%) was lower than that of the conventional group (4.9%), although this difference did not reach statistical significance.
conclusionThe 180° nuclear flip technique is a safe, efficient, and effective method for managing cataracts of grade III hardness and below. It may help reduce the risk of complications, improves intraoperative stability by creating a more spacious operating field, and significantly reduces phacoemulsification time. Video available for this article.
trial registrationchictr.org.cn identifier, ChiCTR2500105241.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.