ArticleEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2026
Machine learning prognostication in nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a european multicentre analysis of survival and risk of second malignancy.
Article in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Interpreting survival differences in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma of unknown primary: time-dependent treatment and biological selection.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
23 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionNasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) is rare in Europe, and emerging data suggest poorer outcomes in Caucasian patients compared with Asian populations, highlighting the need for region-specific prognostic tools. Inflammation-based biomarkers and artificial intelligence show promise for risk stratification and prediction of survival and second primary cancers (SPCs). MATERIALS AND
methodsWe conducted a retrospective multicentre study including 405 NPC patients from six European institutions. Demographic, clinicopathological, and haematologic inflammatory markers were collected, and machine learning algorithms were developed to predict 5-year OS and SPC occurrence. Multiple train-test splitting strategies and machine learning (ML) classifiers were evaluated. Models were tested both with and without systemic inflammatory ratios to assess their added prognostic value.
resultsThe median age was 52 years, 91.6% of patients were classified as White/European ancestry, and 77.3% received chemoradiotherapy. Five-year OS was 66.6%, while 12.8% developed SPC. The Random Forest classifier achieved the best performance for OS prediction (accuracy 0.74; AUC 0.66) using the complete feature set, while SPC prediction reached an accuracy of 0.80 (AUC 0.74). Exclusion of inflammatory markers resulted in a consistent decline in accuracy across all models. Feature-importance analysis highlighted inflammatory ratios among the strongest predictors for both OS and SPC. The present study was reported according to TRIPOD+AI reporting guidelines.
conclusionsThis study presents the first machine-learning prognostic models for nasopharyngeal carcinoma derived from a predominantly Caucasian European multicentre cohort. Systemic inflammatory markers modestly improved overall survival prediction and substantially enhanced second primary cancer risk estimation. The resulting models are transparent, cost-effective, and support the potential benefit of prognostic assessment through machine learning in non-endemic settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.