ReviewJournal of exposure science & environmental epidemiology2026
Is drinking water with low PFAS a significant source of human exposure? Evidence summary.
Review in Journal of exposure science & environmental epidemiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundLow-level contamination of drinking water with per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) is widespread, yet the extent to which such concentrations contribute to human PFAS body burdens remains incompletely characterized.
objectiveTo synthesise evidence on the contribution of low-level PFAS in drinking water (defined as <100 ng/L for any individual PFAS) to PFAS concentrations in human blood.
methodsWe systematically searched Embase, MEDLINE, and Scopus using predefined logic grids. Inclusion criteria were original human studies reporting both drinking water PFAS and blood/serum/plasma PFAS concentrations with a focus on low-level water exposures. Ten studies (n = 4576 participants; 4590 blood samples; 1297 water samples) met criteria. Data were extracted on populations, sampling frames, PFAS species and concentrations, and key findings.
resultsAcross studies from Sweden, China, USA, Germany, and Spain, "low-range" drinking water concentrations were associated with measurable increases in blood PFAS, with the most consistent and pronounced relationships observed for PFHxS. In children and high-consuming adults, water intake (≥7-8 cups/day or 1.8 Litres/day) and duration of residence on a supply amplified association. Evidence for contribution was most consistent at ~10-100 ng/L; below ~10 ng/L, associations were less consistent, though some data suggest PFHxS may influence serum levels even within this lower range. PFOA and PFOS showed weaker water-serum relationships at very low concentrations, compatible with greater contributions from legacy, non-water exposures. Heterogeneity in exposure assessment, timing, covariate control, and analytic reporting limited cross-study comparability. SIGNIFICANCE: Even when drinking water PFAS concentrations are low, certain compounds-particularly PFHxS-can materially contribute to circulating PFAS, especially among children and high-water-consumption subgroups. These findings support compound-specific risk assessment, re-examination of default relative source contribution (RSC) assumptions for sensitive groups, and targeted monitoring that pairs household-level water measurements with biomonitoring. Standardized methods and longitudinal designs are needed to refine low-range concentration-response relationships and cumulative exposure estimates. IMPACT STATEMENT: By summarising 10 epidemiologic studies that investigated the contribution of low-level PFAS in drinking water to PFAS concentrations in human blood using rigorous methodology, our review provides compelling evidence for a link between exposure to drinking water concentrations in the "low" range and measurable increases in blood PFAS. Additionally, it suggests even when drinking water PFAS concentrations are low, certain compounds-particularly PFHxS-can materially contribute to circulating PFAS, especially among children and high water consumption subgroups. Given the nature of this evidence, there is a need for compound-specific risk assessment, re-examination of default relative source contribution assumptions for sensitive groups, and targeted monitoring that pairs household-level water measurements with biomonitoring.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42463894What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.