ArticleScientific reports2026
Acoustic accessibility and staff knowledge on hearing and communication in long-term care facilities: evaluation of a preventive training program.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Age-related hearing loss is highly prevalent among older adults. Long-term care (LTC) residents are an especially vulnerable population, yet hearing accessibility and staff expertise in hearing care often remain insufficient. This study examines (1) the structural and acoustic accessibility conditions in LTC facilities, (2) the hearing-related knowledge and training needs of staff, and (3) staff assessment of feasibility and sustainability of a preventive training program. A mixed-methods study was conducted in 74 LTC facilities in Germany. Data were collected pre- and post-intervention and at one year's follow-up. Data sources included questionnaires, quantitative surveys, room acoustic measurements, and qualitative interviews. Quantitative data were analyzed descriptively; qualitative data were interpreted via structuring qualitative content analysis. Most facilities (81%) lacked acoustic accessibility concepts. More than half of the staff had limited knowledge on hearing and communication and expressed high training needs on this topic prior to the training program. Post-intervention interviews highlighted organizational barriers, but also a strong increase of awareness. Follow-up findings indicated moderate improvements in hearing-related practices and communication after the training program, though structural acoustic changes remained difficult to implement sustainably. The results show that improving hearing accessibility in LTC requires an integrated approach that strengthens both acoustical conditions in the facilities and staff competencies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.