ArticleScientific reports2026
Interleaved premotor rTMS does not affect motor sequence learning.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Acquiring new motor skills is a vital component of lifelong learning and underpins everyday activities. Performance improvements through training evolve from an initially fragile state to one that becomes increasingly resistant to disruption, a process known as motor consolidation. Recent research has indicated that learning takes place even during brief periods of rest - termed micro-offline learning. In healthy young individuals, such intervals may represent the primary source of performance enhancements during training sessions. Other studies have identified both the primary motor cortex (M1) and the premotor cortex (PMC) as pivotal neural structures for motor consolidation. Specifically, it has been demonstrated that 10 Hz interleaved repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (i-rTMS) to M1 during rest intervals between active motor training blocks can enhance post-training offline consolidation without influencing performance during training. Here, we examined whether 10 Hz i-rTMS to the PMC produces similar effects. Contrary to our expectations, our results suggest that premotor i-rTMS does not affect online or offline learning, at both microscopic and macroscopic temporal scales. We also measured corticospinal excitability before and after training, but no detectable effects of training or i-rTMS were observed. Taken together, these findings provide no evidence for an effect of i-rTMS of the PMC on online or offline motor sequence learning. We speculate that consolidation during offline processing in short rest periods between active training phases may not necessarily require involvement of the premotor cortex.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.