Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42463767›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Interleaved premotor rTMS does not affect motor sequence learning.

Felix Psurek, Malte Tiburtius, Joseph Classen, Gesa Hartwigsen, Jost-Julian Rumpf

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Felix Psurek *Department of Neurology, University of Leipzig Medical Center, Leipzig, Germany. felix.psurek@medizin.uni-leipzig.de.ORCID 0000-0002-2028-5600
Malte Tiburtius *Department of Neurology, University of Leipzig Medical Center, Leipzig, Germany.
Joseph ClassenDepartment of Neurology, University of Leipzig Medical Center, Leipzig, Germany.
Gesa HartwigsenWilhelm Wundt Institute for Psychology, Leipzig, Germany.
Jost-Julian RumpfDepartment of Neurology, University of Leipzig Medical Center, Leipzig, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Acquiring new motor skills is a vital component of lifelong learning and underpins everyday activities. Performance improvements through training evolve from an initially fragile state to one that becomes increasingly resistant to disruption, a process known as motor consolidation. Recent research has indicated that learning takes place even during brief periods of rest - termed micro-offline learning. In healthy young individuals, such intervals may represent the primary source of performance enhancements during training sessions. Other studies have identified both the primary motor cortex (M1) and the premotor cortex (PMC) as pivotal neural structures for motor consolidation. Specifically, it has been demonstrated that 10 Hz interleaved repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (i-rTMS) to M1 during rest intervals between active motor training blocks can enhance post-training offline consolidation without influencing performance during training. Here, we examined whether 10 Hz i-rTMS to the PMC produces similar effects. Contrary to our expectations, our results suggest that premotor i-rTMS does not affect online or offline learning, at both microscopic and macroscopic temporal scales. We also measured corticospinal excitability before and after training, but no detectable effects of training or i-rTMS were observed. Taken together, these findings provide no evidence for an effect of i-rTMS of the PMC on online or offline motor sequence learning. We speculate that consolidation during offline processing in short rest periods between active training phases may not necessarily require involvement of the premotor cortex.

Indexed as

LearningMotor CortexMotor SkillsFemaleHumansMaleTranscranial Magnetic StimulationYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID42463767
PMCPMC13377065

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.