ArticleScientific reports2026
A domain-agnostic explainable framework for network attack detection across diverse traffic datasets.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
The increasing complexity, scale, and diversity of cyber threats pose significant challenges to modern network security systems, particularly in heterogeneous network environments. Existing intrusion detection methods often rely on dataset-specific models that struggle to maintain consistent performance across different data distributions and typically lack interpretability, limiting their applicability in critical systems. In this paper, we present an explainable deep learning framework evaluated across multiple heterogeneous cyber attack datasets, including Kitsune (IoT traffic), Server-Based network data (enterprise logs), and Malware Traffic datasets. The proposed pipeline employs a consistent preprocessing strategy involving feature normalisation, encoding, and label alignment, followed by a multi-layer perceptron (MLP) classifier with dropout regularisation. Model training incorporates cosine learning-rate scheduling and early stopping, while explainability is achieved via SHAP-based global feature attribution and LIME-based instance-level explanation. Performance is evaluated using accuracy, ROC-AUC, and F1-score metrics. The model achieves 96.0% accuracy on the Kitsune dataset, 99.99% on the Server-Based dataset, and 99.58% on the Malware dataset, with ROC-AUC values approaching 1.00 across most classes. The results demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed framework in handling heterogeneous network traffic while providing interpretable insights into model predictions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.